journal article·2010-06

Temperature- and dc bias field- dependent piezoelectric effect of soft and hard lead zirconate titanate ceramics

Fei Li, Zhuo Xu, XiaoYong Wei, Xi Yao

Journal of Electroceramics· Volume 24· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The dc bias field-dependent piezoelectric coefficient d 33 of lead zirconate titanate ceramics (PZT5, PZT8 and P5H) were determined by a quasi-static method. It was found that piezoelectric coefficient d 33 was almost independent of positive dc bias field for PZT8 and PZT5 ceramics, while for P5H ceramic an obvious decrease of coefficient d 33 was observed under positive dc bias field. On the other hand, the temperature-dependent piezoelectric response for PZT ceramics were investigated by both quasi-static and resonance methods. The piezoelectric coefficient d 33 was found to increase with increasing temperature for both PZT5 and PZT8 ceramics. For P5H ceramics, coefficient d 33 showed a first decreasing and then increasing tendency with respect to temperature. These results were discussed in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to piezoelectric response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Y.H. Xu, Ferroelectric materials and their applications (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991)
2. A.J. Masys, W. Ren, G. Yang, B.K. Mukherjee, J Appl Phys 94, 1155 (2003). doi: 10.1063/1.158700810.1063/1.1587008 ↗
3. N. Uchida, T Ikeda Jpn J Appl Phys J 4, 867 (1965). doi: 10.1143/JJAP.4.86710.1143/JJAP.4.867 ↗
4. R. Sabat, B.K. Mukherjee, W. Ren, G Yang. J Appl Phys 101, 064111 (2007). doi: 10.1063/1.256044110.1063/1.2560441 ↗
5. IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity, ANSI/IEEE, Std 176-1987
6. S. Emeterio, Ferroelectrics 293, 237 (2003). doi: 10.1080/0015019039023845010.1080/00150190390238450 ↗
7. X.H. Du, Q.M. Wang, K. Uchino, IEEE Trans Ultrason. Ferroelectr Freq Control 50, 312 (2003). doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.119362510.1109/TUFFC.2003.1193625 ↗
8. S. Zhang, J. Luo, W. Hackenberger, T.R. Shrout, J Appl Phys 104, 064106 (2008). doi: 10.1063/1.297833310.1063/1.2978333 ↗
9. S. Zhang, C.A. Randall, T.R. Shrout, Solid State Commun 131, 41 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.04.01610.1016/j.ssc.2004.04.016 ↗
10. S. Zhang, S. Lee, D. Kim, H. Lee, T.R. Shrout, J Am Ceram Soc 90, 3859 (2007)10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02004.x ↗
11. M.J. Haun, E. Furman, S.J. Jang, L.E. Cross, Ferroelectrics 99, 80 (1989)
12. D. Damjanovic, j. Am Ceram Soc 88(10), 2663 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00671.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00671.x ↗
13. D. Damjanovic, Rep Prog Phys 61, 1267 (1998). doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/00210.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 ↗
14. F. Li, Z. Xu, X. Wei, X. Yao, L. Jin, Appl Phys Lett 93, 192904 (2008). doi: 10.1063/1.302584210.1063/1.3025842 ↗
15. D. Damjanovic, J Appl Phys 82, 1788 (1997). doi: 10.1063/1.36598110.1063/1.365981 ↗