journal article·2009-02

Electromechanical performance of structurally graded monolithic piezoelectric actuator

J. Palosaari, J. Juuti, E. Heinonen, V.-P. Moilanen, H. Jantunen

Journal of Electroceramics· Volume 22· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of structural gradients in monolithic piezoelectric actuators is investigated. Different cross-section profiles were micro-machined with a laser into commercial PZT 5H bulk discs with thicknesses of 375 µm and 500 µm (∅ 25 mm). Profiles and curvatures of the actuators were measured which showed both concave and convex structures, thus indicating pre-stress of the actuators. After poling, the distribution of out-of-plane displacement was scanned by a fibre-optic laser vibrometer. Maximum displacements of ∼6.3 µm and ∼24.8 µm were obtained from a freely moving and clamped ∼375 µm thick actuator, respectively, in a ±0.5 V/µm electric field at 10 Hz frequency without load. Furthermore, deflection in the centre of the actuators was measured up to 184 mN load using the same electric field and frequency. Bending of the bulk actuators without any additional layer was a consequence of the gradient in poling and driving electric field via thickness variation of the material. Hence, different regions produced strain distribution and bending in a similar fashion to other benders. Actuators with the highest arch height exhibited the highest displacement and load bearing capabilities derived from the increased area moment of inertia and enhanced piezoelectric response due to pre-stress. The results show that the monolithic bending actuators can be realised by simple structural designing of the actuator. Such structural gradients can be one reason contributing to the higher displacement of RAINBOW actuators compared to other pre-stressed actuators. In a further development, the structural gradients can be utilized in high displacement pre-stressed actuators and in miniaturized monolithic piezoelectric devices.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced machining processes and optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Hall, M. Allahverdi, E. K. Akdogan, A. Safari, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc 25, 2991 (2005)10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.196 ↗
2. G. Li, E. Furman, G.H. Haertling, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80(6), 1382 (1997)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02995.x ↗
3. X. Li, J.S. Vartuli, D.L. Milius, I.A. Aksay, W.Y. Shih, W.-H. Shih, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84(5), 996 (2001)10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00781.x ↗
4. R. W. Schwartz, L. E. Cross, Q. M. Wang, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84(11), 2563 (2001)10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01054.x ↗
5. K. Takagi, J.-F. Li, S. Yokoyama, R. Watanabe, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 23, 1577 (2003)10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00407-7 ↗
6. M. Taya, A. A. Almajid, M. Dunn, H. Takahashi, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 107, 248 (2003)10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00381-9 ↗
7. X. Li, W. Y. Shih, J. S. Vartuli, D. L. Milius, I. A. Aksay, W.-H. Shih, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85(4), 844 (2002)10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00182.x ↗
8. J Juuti, ACTA Universitatis Ouluensis C 235, (2006) Available at http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514279891/
9. A. J. Moskalik, D. Brei, Smart Mater. Struct. 8, 531 (1999)10.1088/0964-1726/8/5/302 ↗
10. S. A. Wise, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 69, 33 (1998)10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01745-7 ↗
11. J. Juuti, E. Heinonen, V.-P. Moilanen, S. Leppävuori, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 1901 (2004)10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00465-5 ↗
12. Q.-M. Wang, L. E. Cross, Mater. Chem. Phys. 58, 20 (1999)10.1016/S0254-0584(98)00241-7 ↗
13. E. Heinonen, J. Juuti, S. Leppävuori, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25, 2467 (2005)10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.083 ↗
14. Q.-M. Wang, L. E. Cross, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82(1), 103 (1999)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01729.x ↗
15. J. Juuti, H. Jantunen, V.-P. Moilanen, S. Leppävuori, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53(5), 838 (2006)10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1632674 ↗
16. Z. Huang, G. Leighton, R. Wright, F. Duval, H. C. Chung, P. Kirby, R. W. Whatmore, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 135(2), 660 (2006)10.1016/j.sna.2006.10.002 ↗
17. K. Yao, F. E. H. Tay, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 50(2), 113 (2003)10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1182115 ↗
18. S. Zhong, Z.-G. Ban, S. P. Alpay, J. V. Mantese, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 142913 (2006)10.1063/1.2358963 ↗
19. J. Hughes, P. G. Bednarchik, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Ferroelectrics, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1, 41 (Jul 21–Aug 2 2000)
20. J. Juuti, H. Jantunen, V.-P. Moilanen, S. Leppävuori, J. Electroceram. Soc. 15, 57 (2005)10.1007/s10832-005-1100-2 ↗
21. J. Mulling, T. Usher, B. Dessent, J. Palmer, P. Franzon, E. Grant, A. Kingon, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 94, 19 (2001)10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00688-4 ↗
22. Q.-M. Wang, Q. Zhang, B. Xu, R. Liu, L. E. Cross, J. Appl. Phys. 86(6), 3352 (1999)10.1063/1.371213 ↗
23. S.-C. Woo, K. H. Park, N. S. Goo, Sens. Actuators A Phys. 137, 110 (2007)10.1016/j.sna.2007.01.018 ↗
24. T. Fett, D. Munz, G. Thun, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 18, 1899 (1999)10.1023/A:1006698724548 ↗
25. O. Guillon, F. Thiebaud, P. Delobelle, D. Perreux, Mater. Lett. 58, 986 (2004)10.1016/j.matlet.2003.08.011 ↗
26. T. Tanimoto, K. Yamamoto, T. Morii, in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on. Applied Ferroelectrics, Pennsylvania, USA 394 (Aug 7–10 1994)