journal article·2020-04-01Open access

Supportless Lattice Structures for Energy Absorption Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling

Ajeet Kumar, Saurav Verma, Jeng-Ywan Jeng

Abstract

Additively manufactured cellular structures represent a promising engineering design concept for making customized products where user-specific mechanical properties are required. One of the major challenges in the additive manufacturing (AM) process is removal of unwanted support structures from the lattice. The support structure consumes extra material, printing time, and energy for manufacturing. Postprinting, it needs extensive postprocessing work to remove it from the lattice structure chemically or mechanically. In the case of flexible materials such as thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), removing the support structure from the lattice is very difficult with the material extrusion process. In this article, a new type of a shell-shaped lattice structure inspired by sea urchin (SU) morphology is designed. This lattice can be additively manufactured by material extrusion processes such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) without requiring any support structures. The mechanical properties of the proposed structure, such as stiffness and energy absorption during loading and unloading, have been evaluated as they are important for cushioning. The compressive results indicate that the stiffness property is almost twice as high compared with the benchmarked, bending-dominated, body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice structure of the same relative density and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) foam. Energy absorption is almost equal to the BCC lattice and 20% better than EVA foam. Last, a predictive model on stiffness behavior and energy return was developed to facilitate a systematic way to select optimal densities of the SU lattice structure for energy-absorbing applications. Visual inspection has also revealed that there is no sagging or failure of the lattice, which reduced the manufacturing time and postprocessing time, saving a significant amount of material without compromising on quality. Supportless lattice printing was also validated by printing the specimen with a different FDM printer and TPU filament. A possible application for supportless lattice structures can be for AM of customized shoe midsoles at low cost, ski boots, tires, automotive crush boxes, or any other energy-absorbing structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

High Speed 3D Printing Research Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Hagel J, , Brown SJ, , Kulasooriya D, et al. The Future of Manufacturing: Making Things in a Changing World. New York, NY: Deloitte University Press,. 2015.
2. 10.1142/S175882511640006810.1142/S1758825116400068 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00510.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
7. 10.1108/1355254031048963110.1108/13552540310489631 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.404162610.1115/1.4041626 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.010 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.6b0976810.1021/acsami.6b09768 ↗
11. 10.1108/0144515031069865210.1108/01445150310698652 ↗
12. 10.1108/1355254001030986810.1108/13552540010309868 ↗
13. 10.1109/TAP.2013.229716510.1109/TAP.2013.2297165 ↗
14. Gibson LJ, , Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
15. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.403730510.1115/1.4037305 ↗
17. 10.3390/designs301001910.3390/designs3010019 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00158-016-1551-x10.1007/s00158-016-1551-x ↗
19. 10.1117/12.225981010.1117/12.2259810 ↗
20. 10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20150154610.1002/adma.201501546 ↗
22. Tao W, , Leu MC. Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. Int Symp Flex Autom, 2016; 1–3. DOI: 10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182.
23. 10.1007/s00170-016-9615-z10.1007/s00170-016-9615-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.037 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20130198610.1002/adma.201301986 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00170-019-04085-310.1007/s00170-019-04085-3 ↗
28. Malcolm T. Domes, arches and urchins: The skeletal architecture of echinoids (Echinodermata). Zoomorphology, 1985; 105:14–124.
29. Gibson LJ, , Ashby MF, , Harley BA. Cellular Materials in Nature and Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
30. 10.1115/1.403395710.1115/1.4033957 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.02910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.029 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.06510.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
33. Thomas D. The Development of Design Rules for Selective Laser Melting. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wales, 2009.
34. Cloots M, , Spierings AB, , Wegener K. Assessing new support minimizing strategies for the additive manufacturing technology SLM. International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. 2013; 631–643.
35. Tancogne-Dejean T, , Diamantopoulou M, , Gorji MB, et al. 3D plate-lattices: An emerging class of low-density metamaterial exhibiting optimal isotropic stiffness. Adv Mater, 2018; 30:1–6.
36. 10.1177/02663511900050030210.1177/026635119000500302 ↗
37. Bagger A. Plate Shell Structures of Glass. Studies Leading to Guidelines for Structural Glass. Doctoral Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark, 2010.
38. Grun TB, , Dehkordi LKF, , Schwinn T, et al. The skeleton of the sand dollar as a biological role model for segmented shells in building construction: a research review. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T, eds. Biomimetic Research for Architecture and Building Construction. Biologically-Inspired Systems, vol 8. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016; pp. 217–242.
39. Schwinn T Krieg OD Menges A. Robotic sewing: a textile approach towards the computational design and fabrication of lightweight timber shells in posthuman frontiers: data designers and cognitive machines. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) Ann Arbor MI 2016 pp. 224–233.10.52842/conf.acadia.2016.224 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0252692710.1007/BF02526927 ↗
41. Pearce P. Structure in Nature is a Strategy for Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990.
42. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.09810.1016/j.procir.2013.03.098 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.04.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.04.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.01310.1016/j.msea.2016.06.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00410.1016/j.addma.2017.11.004 ↗
46. 10.1080/19424280.2014.91818410.1080/19424280.2014.918184 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.07.01010.1016/j.medengphy.2007.07.010 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.04510.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.045 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.00710.1016/j.addma.2018.08.007 ↗