Mechanism of folding a fiber bundle in the curved section of 3D printed carbon fiber reinforced plastics
Source abstract
Abstract
The recent technology enables us to fabricate carbon fiber reinforced plastics which have continuous reinforcement fibers using a 3D printer. Arbitrarily curved reinforcement fibers are able to be configured using this technology, and it had been revealed that a fiber bundle is folded in a printing process of a curved section in the previous research. However, this mechanism has not been clarified. The present study, therefore, experimental investigations were conducted to clarify the folding of a fiber bundle in a printing process of a curved section. In addition, the electrical resistance was measured to clarify the effect of folding to fiber breakage. As a result, we concluded that folding of a fiber bundle attribute to positional relation of two forces; adhesive force to the print bed and tensile force from the print nozzle, and change of configuration of fiber bundle in the printing process. This mechanism is verified using the finite element analysis. In addition, fiber breakage was also revealed measuring the electrical resistance of a printed fiber bundle, and this presumably affects the mechanical properties of curved sections.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA),Tokyo, Japan
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.021 ↗
3. 10.4236/ojcm.2016.6100310.4236/ojcm.2016.61003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.00710.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.007 ↗
5. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-009810.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098 ↗
6. Justo J, Távara L, García-Guzmán L, et al. Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos. Struct. 2018;185:537–548.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
7. 10.1080/09243046.2018.147089410.1080/09243046.2018.1470894 ↗
8. 10.1080/09243046.2017.136884010.1080/09243046.2017.1368840 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.029 ↗
10. 10.4236/ojcm.2016.6401210.4236/ojcm.2016.64012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.01910.1016/j.addma.2018.09.019 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00170-014-6679-510.1007/s00170-014-6679-5 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
14. Zhang H, Yang D, Sheng Y. Performance-driven 3D printing of continuous curved carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites: A preliminary numerical study. Compos. PartB, 2018;151:256–264.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.017 ↗
15. Fischer A, Rommel S, Bauernhansl T. New fiber matrix process with 3D fiber printer-A strategic in process integration of endless fibers using fused deposition modeling (FDM). Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2013;411:167–175.10.1007/978-3-642-41329-2_17 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.080 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
18. 10.1177/002199831664616910.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025 ↗
20. 10.1080/09243046.2018.155832710.1080/09243046.2018.1558327 ↗
21. Tohgo K, Hirako Y, Ishii H. Influence of resin on splitting fracture toughness in unidirectional CFRP. Transactions of the JSME. 1995;61(94):959–964.10.1299/kikaia.61.959 ↗