Production and characterization of magnetic EPDM composites with carbonyl iron powder (CIP) using different curing systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetic composites were manufactured by incorporating 5 phr of Carbonyl Iron Powder (CIP) and 60 phr of carbon black into ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM). This study aimed to examine the impact of different curing systems - sulfur and accelerators, peroxide, and peroxide with co-agents - on the cross-linking of the EPDM matrix while keeping other additives constant. Seven composites were produced and characterized in terms of morphology, cross-link density, rheometric, mechanical, and magnetic properties. The sulfur curing system reduced curing time and increased cross-link density, resulting in higher rigidity. The peroxide-based system, when combined with co-agents, provided optimal performance in elongation and tear strength, with tensile strength values similar to the sulfur system. Cross-link density was highest for the sulfur and accelerator systems, and the Gibbs free energy was higher due to reduced molecular mobility in highly cross-linked networks. The 5 phr CIP content did not affect the physical-mechanical properties. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed minimal interaction between EPDM and CIP, and magnetic analysis showed that the curing system had no significant impact on the magnetic properties of the composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Professor Eloisa Mano Institute of Macromolecules (IMA), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Physics Institute (IF), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/009524431984617610.1177/0095244319846176 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1453501110.1177/1045389X14535011 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/abbc7710.1088/1361-665X/abbc77 ↗
4. Zhukov A (ed). High performance soft magnetic materials. Springer Series in Materials Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, vol 252.
5. 10.1002/pat.410610.1002/pat.4106 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.05.00110.1016/j.aiepr.2020.05.001 ↗
7. 10.1080/25740881.2022.210079210.1080/25740881.2022.2100792 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.1165910.1002/app.11659 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-012464786-2/50010-910.1016/B978-012464786-2/50010-9 ↗
10. 10.5254/1.354764710.5254/1.3547647 ↗
11. 10.1177/009524431351498810.1177/0095244313514988 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10623310.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106233 ↗
13. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac1f6410.1088/1361-665X/ac1f64 ↗
14. ASTM D3568-98. Standard test methods for rubber - evaluation of EPDM (ethylene propylene diene terpolymers) including mixtures with oil. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1998.
15. ASTM D2084-19. Standard test method for rubber property - vulcanization using oscillating disk cure meter. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
16. 10.1063/1.172379210.1063/1.1723792 ↗
17. Flory PJ. Principles of polymer chemistry. 1st ed. New York, NY: Cornell University Press, 1953.
18. ASTM D6204-19. Standard test method for rubber - measurement of unvulcanized rheological properties using rotorless shear rheometers. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
19. ASTM D6601-19. Standard test method for rubber properties - measurement of cure and after-cure dynamic properties using a rotorless shear rheometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
20. 10.5254/1.354741610.5254/1.3547416 ↗
21. 10.5254/1.353871610.5254/1.3538716 ↗
22. 10.1093/oso/9780195181012.001.000110.1093/oso/9780195181012.001.0001 ↗
23. 10.1002/1439-2054(20010401)286:4<260::AID-MAME260>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/1439-2054(20010401)286:4<260::AID-MAME260>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
24. 10.1002/pi.116110.1002/pi.1161 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.03910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.039 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.clay.2010.08.02010.1016/j.clay.2010.08.020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.clay.2015.11.00110.1016/j.clay.2015.11.001 ↗
28. DIN 53504-2009/10. Testing of rubber - determination of tensile strength at break, tensile stress at yield, elongation at break and stress values in a tensile test. Berlin, Germany: DIN, 2009.
29. ASTM D624-00. Standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2000.
30. ASTM D2240-15. Standard test method for rubber property—durometer hardness. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2015.
31. ASTM D2632-15. Standard test method for rubber property - resilience by vertical rebound. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2015.
32. 10.3390/ma1320459710.3390/ma13204597 ↗
33. Ciesielski A. An introduction to rubber technology. 1st ed. London: Rapra Technology Ltd, 1999.
34. Barlow FW. Rubber compounding principles, materials and techniques. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, 1988.
35. 10.1177/14777606130290020310.1177/147776061302900203 ↗
36. Henning SK, Costin R. Fundamentals of curing elastomers with peroxides and coagentes. Rubber World 2006; 233: 28–35.
37. 10.34117/bjdv8n3-23110.34117/bjdv8n3-231 ↗
38. 10.1177/1045389X1351731010.1177/1045389X13517310 ↗
39. 10.1002/pen.2478110.1002/pen.24781 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11086810.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110868 ↗
41. 10.1002/352760652110.1002/3527606521 ↗