Comparison of methods for determining the gel content in natural rubber and the effect of gel content on rheological behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural rubber, given its natural origin, is not composed exclusively of polyisoprene chains, but also of so-called non-rubber components such as proteins or phospholipids. Such compounds are responsible for gel formation - insoluble phase if natural rubber (NR) is in a proper solvent. Gel is one of the causes why the behavior of NR is non-standard during processing. The gel content is determined by various methods, while it is not examined in detail which method has a stronger relation to the rheological behavior of rubber. Three different methods (filtration, dissolution in toluene for three different times and Soxhlet extraction) used for determining the gel content of NR are compared in this paper. Analytical (ash content, molar mass measurement, …) and rheological (Mooney viscosity, rubber process analyzer measurements, …) measurements are performed and their results are correlated with the gel content values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Lubricants and Their Additives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Polymers, Praha, Czech Republic
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Sethuraj MR · 2012
2. 10.1002/app.1963.07007021710.1002/app.1963.070070217 ↗
3. 10.5254/1.354310210.5254/1.3543102 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.2184510.1002/app.21845 ↗
5. 10.5254/1.353845410.5254/1.3538454 ↗
6. 10.1002/pat.388710.1002/pat.3887 ↗
7. 10.1515/gps-2018-001910.1515/gps-2018-0019 ↗
8. 10.1201/978148227036510.1201/9781482270365 ↗
9. 10.5254/1.353579510.5254/1.3535795 ↗
10. 10.5254/1.353998110.5254/1.3539981 ↗
11. 10.1134/S156009041907003010.1134/S1560090419070030 ↗
12. 10.1002/pol.1975.17013120710.1002/pol.1975.170131207 ↗
13. 10.1021/bm058003x10.1021/bm058003x ↗
14. 10.5254/1.354502210.5254/1.3545022 ↗
15. 10.5254/1.353614810.5254/1.3536148 ↗
16. 10.5254/1.354779910.5254/1.3547799 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.2650710.1002/app.26507 ↗
18. Amnuaypornsri S · Kgk Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe · 2009 · 62 · 88
19. 10.1039/c003087b10.1039/c003087b ↗
20. 10.5254/1.354779510.5254/1.3547795 ↗
21. 10.5254/1.354499910.5254/1.3544999 ↗
22. 10.5254/1.354779610.5254/1.3547796 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.4306210.1002/app.43062 ↗
24. 10.1002/pen.2043310.1002/pen.20433 ↗
25. Eng A · J. Rubber Res · 2002 · 5 · 199
26. 10.5254/1.353598710.5254/1.3535987 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00396-004-1187-z10.1007/s00396-004-1187-z ↗
28. 10.1016/0032-3861(86)90177-110.1016/0032-3861(86)90177-1 ↗
29. 10.1002/app.4205110.1002/app.42051 ↗
30. 10.1016/0032-3861(90)90276-510.1016/0032-3861(90)90276-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.01010.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.010 ↗
32. 10.1021/ma00122a05010.1021/ma00122a050 ↗
33. Intapun J · J Appl Polym Sci · 2010 · 118 · 134110.1002/app.32331 ↗
34. Sakdapipanich J · KGK Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe · 2007 · 60 · 380
35. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.003 ↗
36. 10.1021/bm058004p10.1021/bm058004p ↗
37. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991220)74:13<3078::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991220)74:13<3078::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗