journal article·2002-02

Development of butyl elastomer/methacrylate monomer systems as denture soft lining materials

P.D. Riggs, S. Parker, M. Braden, S. Kalachandra

Biomaterials· Volume 23· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Previous studies have shown elastomer/methacrylate monomer formulations to have good strength; however, water uptake was high and they also suffered from oxidation. This study has looked at the use of three different butyl elastomers, well known for their oxidation resistance, butyl (PB), chlorobutyl (PCB) and bromobutyl (PBB). The tensile and water uptake properties of the three elastomers gelled with ethyl hexyl methacrylate containing 1% ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and 1% lauryl peroxide (5+ formulation from previous studies) were studied. Water uptake of the pure elastomers was also measured. Tensile strengths were low (PCB5+ = 3.09+/-0.12 MPa and PBB5+ = 3.90+/-0.36 MPa); however, elongation to break values were high (PCB5+ = 797+/-17% and PBB5+ = 599+/-13%). Water uptake was high and protracted with none of the formulations reaching equilibrium. The PCB5+ had the highest uptake (approximately 6% at 203 days) with that for PBB5+ and PB5+ at a similar level (approxiamtely 4% at 203 days). None of the materials showed any sign of oxidation. The PBB proved to be the most suitable of the three elastomers for further development in soft lining formulations.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Denture soft lining materials10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb00704.x ↗
2. Soft lining materials in prosthetic dentistry
3. An alternative treatment
4. Complete dentures—the soft option. An update for general dental practice10.1038/sj.bdj.4809374 ↗
5. Water absorption and water solubility of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures10.1177/00220345830620061601 ↗
6. Age changes in the viscoelasticity of permanent soft lining materials10.1016/0300-5712(93)90028-O ↗
7. In vitro toxicity of tissue conditioners10.1016/0022-3913(91)90448-6 ↗
8. Soft prosthetic materials based on powdered elastomers10.1016/0142-9612(90)90062-U ↗
9. Effect of composition on the mechanical properties and water sorption of a butadiene/styrene copolymer-methacrylate monomer soft lining material10.1007/BF00119739 ↗
10. Development of novel elastomer/methacrylate monomer soft lining materials10.1023/A:1011207523276 ↗
11. Brydson JA. Rubber chemistry. Applied Science Publishers, 1978. p. 140.10.1007/978-94-009-9221-4 ↗
12. Brydson JA. Rubbery material and their compounds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Applied Science, 1988. p. 102.
13. Water absorption of methacrylate soft lining materials10.1016/0142-9612(89)90037-9 ↗