journal article·2005-06

Fatigue behavior of packable composites

Y. Abe, M.J.A. Braem, Paul Lambrechts, S. Inoue, M. Takeuchi, B. Van Meerbeek

Biomaterials· Volume 26· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the flexural fatigue behavior of 11 packable composites. Of each material 30 rectangular samples (1.2 x 5 x 35 mm) for flexural fatigue test were prepared. The clamped fracture strength and flexural fatigue limit (FFL) of each material were determined using a custom-made fatigue machine, after storage of the samples for one month in water at 37 degrees C. All data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni/Dunn's test for multiple comparisons (p<0.05). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between elastic modulus (Abe et al., 2001), clamped fracture strength or FFL and inorganic filler fraction (vol%). The fracture strengths of all but two materials were in between those of the compact-filled densified composites and the microfine ones. The FFL of the packable composites tested were significantly lower than those of the compact-filled densified composites. Three of the tested materials showed even significantly lower FFL than did the microfine composites. There were statistically significant relationships between both the elastic modulus and the volumetric filler fraction (R(2)=0.974, p=1.990 x 10(-7)). The great diversity in packable composites makes clinical assessment necessary with regard to a justified use in posterior teeth.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Composite resins in the 21st century
3. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00082-2 ↗
4. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials
5. Properties of packable dental composites10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00224.x ↗
6. Dynamic elastic modulus of ‘packable’ composites10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00012-4 ↗
7. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00015-X ↗
8. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites
9. Simulated oral wear of packable composites
10. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M ↗
11. O’Brien WJ. Physical properties. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 1997. p. 13–23.
12. In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composites10.1002/jbm.820281203 ↗
13. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials10.1177/00220345900690120201 ↗
14. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers10.1016/0109-5641(95)80049-2 ↗
15. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials10.1177/00220345790580031101 ↗
16. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00049-6 ↗
17. Determination of Young's modulus of dental composites10.1007/BF01132936 ↗
18. Influence of water exposure on the tensile strength of composites10.1177/00220345900690120501 ↗
19. A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations10.1016/0109-5641(92)90068-N ↗
20. In vitro vibrational wear under small displacements of dental materials opposed to annealed chromium-steel counterbodies10.1016/0109-5641(92)90015-5 ↗