journal article·2012-11

Comparative experimental studies of phosphate glass fiber/polypropylene and phosphate glass fiber/natural rubber composites

Haydar U. Zaman, Mubarak A. Khan, Ruhul A. Khan

Journal of Elastomers & Plastics· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Phosphate glass fiber (PGF)-reinforced polypropylene (PP)/natural rubber (NR)-based unidirectional composites with four levels of fiber loading (5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%) were fabricated by compression molding. The influence of the addition of fiber loadings on the mechanical properties such as tensile strength, bending strength, tensile modulus, and percentage elongation at break of the composites was investigated. Based on the fiber loading, 20% PGF-reinforced PP composites yielded better mechanical properties compared with the PGF/NR composites. Degradation tests of the composites were performed in aqueous and soil medium, and it was found that PGF/NR composites lost much of its original strength and modulus compared with that of the PGF/PP composites. Interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of PGF/PP and PGF/NR systems was investigated using the single-fiber fragmentation tests. The IFSS of PGF/PP and PGF/NR systems appeared to be 5.5 and 1.1 MPa, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Radiation and Polymer Chemistry Laboratory, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Bangladesh Atomic Energy commission, Dhaka, Bangladesh

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Seible F, Karbhari VM. Advanced composites for civil engineering applications in the United States. In: Saadatmanesh F, Ehsani ER, Ehsani MR (eds). In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on composites in infrastructure, University of Arizona, Tucson, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, 1209E 2nd street, Tucson, AZ, 85721-0072, USA, 1996-1-15, pp.21–37.
2. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00157-210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00157-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
4. 10.1080/0360255950800959910.1080/03602559508009599 ↗
5. 10.1177/073168440809037110.1177/0731684408090371 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.1359310.1002/app.13593 ↗
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1739::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1739::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
8. 10.1002/app.2902810.1002/app.29028 ↗
9. 10.1002/pat.53010.1002/pat.530 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.2884410.1002/app.28844 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.2473810.1002/app.24738 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.2312110.1002/app.23121 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.2453010.1002/app.24530 ↗
14. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90091-410.1016/0142-9612(94)90091-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.042 ↗
16. Hench LL, Thomson I. Comprehensive composite materials. In: Kelly A, Zweben C (eds). Vol. 6. Design and Applications, London: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Ltd, 2000, pp.727–753.10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00191-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00547-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00547-7 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.82026120310.1002/jbm.820261203 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1829-3_910.1007/978-1-4613-1829-3_9 ↗
20. 10.1002/jab.77003030610.1002/jab.770030306 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00068-810.1016/S0143-7496(99)00068-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-5 ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970915)36:4<469::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970915)36:4<469::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-5 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:101865713117810.1023/A:1018657131178 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.2069610.1002/app.20696 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
29. 10.1002/app.2905010.1002/app.29050 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90184-410.1016/0022-3093(84)90184-4 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.2627610.1002/app.26276 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0011574610.1007/BF00115746 ↗
33. Honggang W, Zheng A, Dae G. Study on the interfacial bonding of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composite. 2. Effect elements on interfacial shear strength and determination of its optimum. East China University of Technology, Fuhe Cailiao Xuebao, 1999; 16: 51–56.