Swelling behavior and tensile strength of additively manufactured and commercial O-rings in the presence of linear, branched, cyclic, and aromatic compounds and alcohols
Source abstract
Abstract
O-rings were manufactured using vat photopolymerization additive manufacturing (AM) processes using acrylate and dimethacrylate monomers. Preliminary tests using Flexible 80A and Elastic 50A resin with various printing orientations show that Flexible 80A in the “optimal” orientation is best for printing. Exposure of these O-rings and those from commercial sources to linear, branched, cyclic, and aromatic compounds and alcohols for 24 h causes swelling and changes in the ultimate tensile strength. AM O-rings swell less than the commercially manufactured acrylate O-rings, and their greatest swellings occur with aromatic compounds and the least swellings with linear alkanes. The swelling behavior of commercial O-rings is consistent with reported Hansen solubility parameters. The AM O-ring swelling patterns as a function of Hansen solubility parameters are similar to those of commercial acrylate O-rings. The tensile strength of the unexposed AM O-rings is less than the commercial O-rings and has greater variability. Swelling reduces the ultimate tensile strength of the acrylate O-rings. After evaporation, the tensile strengths of most of the O-rings return to their unexposed values. One major exception is AM O-rings exposed to toluene, where structural damage caused much lower tensile strengths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, USA
Independent researcher, Jersey City, NJ, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, USA
Funding
Northrup Grumman
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.01910.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.019 ↗
2. 10.1021/ef101520v10.1021/ef101520v ↗
3. 10.1021/ef800117910.1021/ef8001179 ↗
4. 10.1021/ef800803710.1021/ef8008037 ↗
5. Lawless GW · Elastomerics · 1984 · 22
6. Bandyopadhyay A · 2016 · 1
7. 10.1021/acsapm.8b0016510.1021/acsapm.8b00165 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41598-019-56350-w10.1038/s41598-019-56350-w ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b0082810.1021/acs.analchem.7b00828 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.9b2227210.1021/acsami.9b22272 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.10310.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.103 ↗
12. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Rubber property-Effect of Liquids, D471-16a. West Conshohoken, PA: ASTM International, 2021, pp. 1–15.
13. Lara J · Internat J Curr Res · 2017 · 9 · 47860
14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960321)59:12<1857::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960321)59:12<1857::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
15. 10.1021/ef700569k10.1021/ef700569k ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0312110.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03121 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0013210.1021/acs.macromol.1c00132 ↗
18. 10.1039/D1TB00484K10.1039/D1TB00484K ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.026 ↗
20. Formlabs. Formlabs Technical Data Sheet, Engineering Resin Flexible 80A. Formlabs, 2020, pp. 1–2, https://formlabs.com/materials/flexible-elastic/.
21. Formalbs. Formlabs Material Data Sheet Elastic 50A. Formlabs, 2020, pp. 1–2, https://formlabs.com/materials/flexible-elastic/.
22. 10.1021/ef050191x10.1021/ef050191x ↗
23. Roslaili AA · Int J Civ Environ Eng · 2010 · 10 · 1
24. Parker_Hannifin Parker · 2021
25. Formlabs · 2020
26. Formlabs. Formlabs Safety data sheet, Elastic 50A Resin. Formlabs, 2020, pp. 1–10, https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/2001417-SDS-ENUS-0.pdf.
27. Bernhard R, Blobner U, ORingPruflaborRichter Expert Knowledge Test Procedures of Elastomer components, Tensile test on O-rings Why and how? 2014, https://www.o-ring-prueflabor.de/files/expert_knowledge_-_tensile_set_06_2014_.pdf. (accessed on 20 December 2021).
28. ASTM · 2015
29. 10.1201/978142000683410.1201/9781420006834 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00289-020-03516-610.1007/s00289-020-03516-6 ↗
31. 10.1201/978020391011510.1201/9780203910115 ↗
32. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961219)62:12<2081::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961219)62:12<2081::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.007 ↗
34. Farfan-Cabrera LI · Mater Res Express · 2019 · 6 · 10
35. Brostow W · 2009 · 155
36. Hertz DLSE
37. Kuo ACM · 2009 · 539
38. 10.1177/009524431988877310.1177/0095244319888773 ↗
39. Ramanathan LS · 2009 · 109310.1093/oso/9780195181012.003.0191 ↗
40. 10.3390/molecules2407134610.3390/molecules24071346 ↗
41. Wypych G · 2019