In situ epoxidation of canola oil via peracetic acid mechanism-optimization and kinetic study
Source abstract
Abstract
Canola oil can serve as a substitute for polyol in the production of eco-friendly polyurethane. The aim of this study is to investigate the optimal conditions for the epoxidation of canola oil via the Taguchi optimization method. To date, there is no published work on optimization of process parameters for epoxidized canola oil production using the Taguchi method. In this study, the epoxidation of canola oil was performed using in situ-generated peracetic acid. Peracetic acid was formed by the reaction between acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a catalyst. The highest conversion to oxirane of 85% was achieved at a ratio of 2:1 of hydrogen peroxide to canola oil, a temperature of 65°C, and a stirring speed of 400 rpm. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) characterization reveals the presence of the oxirane ring group, identified at a wavenumber of 1150 cm −1 . Employing particle swarm numerical simulations, the results exhibit excellent agreement with the experimental data, thereby confirming the accuracy and validity of the kinetic model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Conducting polymers and applications · Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Engineering Studies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Malaysia
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Funding
Universiti Teknologi MARA · MM Biomass Global Sdn Bhd
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.09310.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.093 ↗
2. Firdaus FE · 2021 · 2 · 2333
3. 10.1007/s11746-006-1021-510.1007/s11746-006-1021-5 ↗
4. 10.1007/s13399-023-04019-w10.1007/s13399-023-04019-w ↗
5. 10.3390/catal1107076510.3390/catal11070765 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b0025110.1021/acs.oprd.5b00251 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ces.2023.11846710.1016/j.ces.2023.118467 ↗
8. 10.13031/2013.2777210.13031/2013.27772 ↗
9. 10.2298/CICEQ171012008G10.2298/CICEQ171012008G ↗
10. Vanags E · Journal of Renewable Materials · 2018 · 6 · 764
11. 10.1016/j.sajce.2022.10.01110.1016/j.sajce.2022.10.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11329410.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113294 ↗
13. 10.1002/kin.2120810.1002/kin.21208 ↗
14. Zheng JL · Epox Using Prileschajew Method · 2015 · 4 · 1
15. 10.1177/09673911180260040310.1177/096739111802600403 ↗
16. 10.1021/bk-2021-1399.ch00110.1021/bk-2021-1399.ch001 ↗
17. Athreya S · Int Ref J Eng Sci · 2012 · 1 · 13
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.07810.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.078 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11188110.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111881 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1315246910.3390/polym13152469 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11746-008-1277-z10.1007/s11746-008-1277-z ↗
22. 10.1002/slct.20220297710.1002/slct.202202977 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.00110.1016/j.cep.2006.06.001 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00289-023-05029-410.1007/s00289-023-05029-4 ↗
25. 10.1002/jctb.670610.1002/jctb.6706 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10924-023-03056-w10.1007/s10924-023-03056-w ↗
27. 10.1002/ep.1376410.1002/ep.13764 ↗