Force sensors for measuring microenvironmental forces during mesenchymal condensation
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical forces are an essential element to early tissue formation. However, few techniques exist that can quantify the mechanical microenvironment present within cell-dense neotissues and organoid structures. Here is a versatile approach to measure microscale, cellular forces during mesenchymal condensation using specially tailored, hyper-compliant microparticles (HCMPs). Through monitoring of HCMP deformation over both space and time, measurements of the mechanical forces that cells exert, and have exerted on them, during tissue formation are acquired. The current study uses this technology to track changes in the mechanical microenvironment as mesenchymal stem cells self-assemble into spheroids and condense into cohesive units. An array analysis approach, using a high-content imaging system, shows that cells exert a wide range of tensile and compressive forces during the first few hours of self-assembly, followed by a period of relative equilibrium. Cellular interactions with HCMPs are further examined by applying collagen coating, which allows for increased tensile forces to be exerted compared to non-coated HCMPs. Importantly, the hyper-compliant nature of our force sensors allows for increased precision over less compliant versions of the same particle. This sensitivity resolves small changes in the microenvironment even at the earliest stages of development and morphogenesis. The overall experimental platform provides a versatile means for measuring direct and indirect spatiotemporal forces in cell-dense biological systems.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Spaceflight effects on biology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis10.1038/nrm2222 ↗
2. Mechanical control of tissue and organ development10.1242/dev.024166 ↗
3. Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction10.1101/cshperspect.a005066 ↗
4. Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79767-9 ↗
5. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices10.1038/nmeth.1531 ↗
6. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force10.1073/pnas.0235407100 ↗
7. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension10.1126/science.1064829 ↗
8. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues10.1038/nmeth.2761 ↗
9. Cell-like pressure sensors reveal increase of mechanical stress towards the core of multicellular spheroids under compression10.1038/ncomms14056 ↗
10. Quantifying compressive forces between living cell layers and within tissues using elastic round microgels10.1038/s41467-018-04245-1 ↗
11. Dispersible hydrogel force sensors reveal patterns of solid mechanical stress in multicellular spheroid cultures10.1038/s41467-018-07967-4 ↗
12. Polyacrylamide bead sensors for in vivo quantification of cell-scale stress in zebrafish development
13. Microparticle traction force microscopy reveals subcellular force exertion patterns in immune cell-target interactions10.1038/s41467-019-13804-z ↗
14. Influence of inherent mechanophenotype on competitive cellular adherence10.1007/s10439-017-1841-5 ↗
15. Fabricating polyacrylamide microbeads by inverse emulsification to mimic the size and elasticity of living cells10.1039/C6BM00692B ↗
16. Cell mimicking microparticles influence the organization, growth, and mechanophenotype of stem cell spheroids10.1007/s10439-018-2028-4 ↗
17. Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.03.006 ↗
18. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine10.1161/01.RES.0000265074.83288.09 ↗
19. Adipose‐derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC10.1002/cbf.1488 ↗
20. Effect of elastic modulus on inertial displacement of cell-like particles in microchannels10.1063/5.0017770 ↗
21. Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy10.1016/j.joca.2005.12.003 ↗
22. Quantitative live-cell confocal imaging of 3D spheroids in a high-throughput format10.1177/2472630318756058 ↗
23. Integration of hyper-compliant microparticles into a 3D melanoma tumor model10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.018 ↗
24. Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype10.1038/nprot.2010.81 ↗
25. T.J. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Courier Corporation2012.
26. Dynamic three-dimensional culture methods enhance mesenchymal stem cell properties and increase therapeutic potential10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0432 ↗
27. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
28. Three-dimensional aggregates of mesenchymal stem cells: cellular mechanisms, biological properties, and applications10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0537 ↗
29. Rods, tori, and honeycombs: the directed self‐assembly of microtissues with prescribed microscale geometries10.1096/fj.07-8710com ↗