Flexural Behavior of Full-Scale Composite Structural Insulated Floor Panels
Source abstract
Abstract
Panelized systems are prefabricated components that are brought to a construction site and assembled into the finished structure. Traditional constructions are often subjected to termite attack, mold buildups and have poor penetration resistance against wind-borne debris. To overcome these problems, a new type of composite structural insulated panel (CSIP) was developed and is analyzed in this study for structural floor applications. The concept of the panel is based on the theory of sandwich construction. The proposed composite panel is made of low cost orthotropic thermoplastic glass/polypropylene (glass–PP) laminate as a facesheet and expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) as a core. Full scale experimental testing was conducted to study the flexural behavior of the CSIP floor member. CSIP floor panels failed due to facesheet/core debonding. Analytical modeling was further presented to predict the interfacial tensile stress at the core/facesheet interface, critical wrinkling stress, flexural strength and deflections for structural CSIP floor panels. The experimental results were validated using the proposed models and were in good agreement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1075 13th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-4440, PH 205-934-8432, USA, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt
b Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1075 13th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-4440, PH 205-934-8432, USA;, Email: nuddin@uab.edu
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Zenkert D. · 1995
2. Mousa M. · 2007
3. Khotpal A. · 2004
4. Shelar K. · 2006
5. Uddin N. · ACI Struct. J. · 2007 · 104 · 722
6. Vaidya S. · 2009
7. Mousa M. · J. Engng Struct. · 2009 · 31 · 233710.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.009 ↗
8. Chevali S. · 2009
9. Daniel I. M. · Intl J. Damage Mech. · 2002 · 11 · 30910.1106/105678902027247 ↗
10. Gdoutos E. E. · J. Mech. Mater. · 2003 · 35 · 51110.1016/S0167-6636(02)00267-3 ↗
11. Kardomateas, G. A. Global buckling of wide sandwich panels with orthotropic phases. Proc. 7th Intl Conf. Sandwich Structures. Denmark: Aalborg University.
12. Allen H. G. · 1969
13. Galletti G. G. · J. Engng Failure Anal. · 2007 · 15 · 55510.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.04.004 ↗
14. Gough G. S. · J. Royal Aeronaut. Soc. · 1940 · 44 · 1210.1017/S036839310010495X ↗
15. Hoff N. J. · J. Aeronaut. Sci. · 1945 · 12 · 28510.2514/8.11246 ↗
16. Hartness T. · Composites: Part A · 2001 · 32 · 115510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00061-6 ↗
17. Company literature, Crane Composites, Inc., 23525 W Eames, Channahon, IL 60410, USA .
18. Company literature, Universal Packaging, Inc., 2216 Greenspring Drive Lutherville, MD 21093, USA .
19. Morley M. · 2000
20. 2005
21. Alwin H. · 2002
22. 2000
23. Vonach W. K. · Archive Appl. Mech. · 2000 · 70 · 33810.1007/s004199900065 ↗
24. Southward T. · J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. · 2008 · 10 · 19510.1177/1099636207081346 ↗
25. Sleight D. W. · 1995
26. Niu K. · J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. · 1999 · 1 · 25910.1177/109963629900100402 ↗
27. Ley R. P. · 1999
28. Cox H. L. · 1945
29. Plantema F. J. · 1966