journal article·2008-12

Architectures “on ruins” and ambiguous transparency: The glass in preservation and communication of archaeology

Aldo Renato Daniele Accardi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The contemporary architecture is characterized by an even more marked transparency, as a result of a continuous experimentation all directed towards the search of the built “lightness”, that is towards the “dematerialization” of the architecture and the consequent loss of weight connected to the excess of form. It is in 1851 that a New Architectural Age springs because of the realization of the Crystal Palace, in London – that has addressed towards the experimentation of the glass as an architectural, structural element and of design. Today, part of this experimentation has been applied for some interventions of coverage, protection and communication in situ of the archaeological ruins. Also they are expressions that give consistence to an architecture of glass defined by a strong identity and a proper language. In these cases the box of glass plays a determining role in the definition of the atmosphere that edges the ruins. It happens, however, that the demands of protection – especially if treated without attentively reflecting on the meaning of the archaeological emergencies – the demands of protection conduct to the building of pure containers, whose prominent characteristic seems to be the negation of the inside space, reduced to a simple transparent box. Some international representative cases of study will be exposed in which transparency has been used with a language and a more appropriate symbolism to evoke archaeological preexistences.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Re · 1997
2. Re · 1997
3. W. Nerdinger, et al., Bruno Taut: 1880–1938, Milano (2001) (tit. orig.: Bruno Taut 1880–1938). Architektur zwischen. Tradition und Avantgarde, Monaco di Baviera, 2001.
4. Scheerbart · 1972
5. Transparency and architecture
6. Calabrese · 1987
7. The use of glass in architecture
8. Cfr. F. Madeo, Nuvole e piume di cristallo. Trasparenza in continua evoluzione, article online, Available at: .
9. Lasserre · 2002
10. Un tetto per la storia [Musée de Vésone]
11. Rivelare e proteggere: musée Vesunna, Périgueux
12. Ruggieri Tricoli · 2007
13. V. Minucciani, M. Lerma, Belgio e Lussemburgo: musealizzazioni fra archeologia romana e medievale, in M.C. Ruggieri Tricoli, Musei sulle rovine. Architetture nel contesto archeologico, pp. 196–200.
14. Robert · Architecture d'aujourd'hui · 1993 · 289
15. H.K. Gans, «Badenweiler/Heitersheim: Römerbad und Villa Urbana», in: A. Pomper, et al. Archäologie Erleben, Theiss, Stuttgard, 2004, pp. 39–42.
16. R.M. Zito, Austria e Germania: Il Limes, le ville romane e l'archeologia urbana, in: M.C. Ruggieri Tricoli, Musei sulle rovine. Architetture nel contesto archeologico, Lybra, pp. 264–270;
17. S. Ranellucci, Strutture protettive e conservazione dei siti archeologici, Carsa Edizioni Pescara (1996)
18. M. W. Thompson, Ruins: Their Preservation and display, British Museum Publications London (1981).
19. A. Hanke, Baden-Württemberg, Theiss, Stuttgart, 2001, pp. 47–48.
20. Project by Schlaich, Bergermann und Partner di Stuttgart; cfr. M.C. Ruggieri Tricoli, Teatri e anfiteatri romani: gli interventi recenti sullo sfondo dell'esperienza di alcuni paesi europei, in: Dioniso, no. 5, 2006, pp. 306–333.
21. Glasdach über der römischen Badruine in Badenweiler
22. Lo Xanten Archäologischer Park: un caso di sperimentazione
23. Ruggieri Tricoli · 2000
24. Siti archeologici: problemi di reintegrazione culturale e nuove forme di teatralizzazione
25. 1999