journal article·2017-03

How visitors value traditional built environment? Evidence from a contingent valuation survey

Stella Giannakopoulou, Eleni Xypolitakou, Dimitris Damigos, Dimitris Kaliampakos

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The region of Mani, in Peloponnese, Greece, is a popular tourism destination known for its history and the beauty of its austere, stone-made built environment. In order to examine tourists’ preferences and attitudes towards the local architectural heritage a Contingent Valuation survey was conducted. Practically all respondents believe that the local architecture should be preserved and they vote for a development plan aiming at protecting and promoting local architecture. Furthermore, almost half of the visitors would be willing to voluntary contribute, on average, a lump sum amount of about €75 to maintain the traditional character of Mani. The findings of the survey outline that the traditional architecture is valuable not only in aesthetic, scientific, symbolic, historic or cultural but also in economic terms. The latter could be used in cost-benefit analysis of historic sites by policy and decision makers, and development practitioners wishing to protect the traditional built environment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Economic and Environmental Valuation · Housing Market and Economics · Urban Planning and Valuation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Giannakopoulou · 2012
2. 2002
3. Valuation of the historic environment: the scope for using economic valuation evidence in the appraisal of heritage-related projects10.1016/j.progress.2008.01.001 ↗
4. European Expert Network on Culture (EENC) · 2013
5. Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute framework microeconomic perspectives and policy implications
6. Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: a choice modeling approach10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.014 ↗
7. Skarin · 2011
8. The market value of cultural heritage in urban areas: an application of spatial hedonic pricing
9. Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: changing policies and perspectives10.1080/13527258.2012.710852 ↗
10. Application of the travel cost method for the valuation of the Poseidon temple in Sounio, Greece10.1016/j.culher.2014.09.011 ↗
11. Regional aspects of heritage economics: analytical issues and policy application
12. The value of heritage
13. Throsby · 2010
14. Allison · 1996
15. The non-priced benefits of renovating historic buildings. A case study of Newcastle's Grainger Town10.1016/0264-2751(96)00029-7 ↗
16. “Economic benefits to foreigners visiting Morocco Accruing from the Rehabilitation of the Fes Medina
17. Pagiola · 1999
18. Contingent valuation of a cultural public good and policy design: the case of “Napoli Musei Aperti”10.1023/A:1007642231963 ↗
19. Untapped demand for heritage: a contingent valuation study of Prinsep Ghat, Calcutta10.1016/j.tourman.2005.07.021 ↗
20. Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site and willingness-to-pay determinants: a case of Changdeok Palace10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.024 ↗
21. Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates10.1007/s10640-006-9056-5 ↗
22. Assessing the economic value of vernacular architecture of mountain regions using Contingent Valuation10.1007/s11629-011-2005-y ↗
23. Protection of architectural heritage: attitudes of local residents and visitors in Sirako Greece10.1007/s11629-015-3482-1 ↗
24. The valuation of historical sites: a case study of Valdivia10.1080/09640560802504696 ↗
25. Navrud · 1992 · 110
26. Pearce · 1998
27. Contingent valuation
28. Planning and actions of the public and private sector in the historical peninsula of Mani
29. ELSTAT · 2011
30. National Printing Office, Official Gazette · 1978
31. Haab · 2003
32. 2006
33. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
34. Bateman · 2002
35. 2006
36. Mitchell · 1989
37. Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of contingent valuation models10.1006/jeem.1996.0051 ↗
38. Contingent valuation: past, present and future
39. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.003 ↗
40. Valuing water quality monitoring: a contingent valuation experiment involving hypothetical and real payments10.1017/S1068280500001672 ↗
41. Comparing the economic value of reducing fire risk to spotted owl habitat in California and Oregon10.1093/forestscience/43.4.473 ↗
42. Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty10.1006/jeem.2001.1193 ↗
43. Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: a case study of the National Museum of Sculpture in Valladolid, Spain10.1023/A:1026353218280 ↗
44. Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.002 ↗
45. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-V ↗
46. Contingent valuation and incentives10.2307/3146855 ↗
47. Protest responses and willingness-to-pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00145-7 ↗
48. Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys10.1080/0003684022000015900 ↗
49. Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: explaining their motivation10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021 ↗
50. Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199901/02)10:1<87::AID-ENV339>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
51. Protest bidders in contingent valuation10.1017/S0899367X00002683 ↗
52. Assessing health effects in contingent valuation surveys: some practical problems
53. The lost value of groundwater: the case of Asopos river basin in Central Greece10.1007/s11269-011-9910-2 ↗