journal article·2024-01-02

The contribution of numerical models to Lamb-wave-driven NDT processes – part II: experimental design and numerical studies

Morten Voß, Artur Szewieczek, Wolfgang Hillger, till Vallée, Friedrich von Dungern

Advanced Composite Materials· Volume 33· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

During production or service life, lightweight components made of fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) may suffer from different types of defects such as cracks or delamination, which may be detected, amongst others, with the help of ultrasonic lamb waves (LW). The study intends to illustrate the potentials of numerical models to assist the design of LW-based non-destructive testing (NDT) processes. For that, the complete NDT chain of an LW driven inspection system was supported by a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using stringer-stiffened C FRP panels as an exemplary component. The study was divided in two publications: The first part focused on the description of the numerical model, illustration of its functionalities and – most importantly – the determination of LW related effects that were needed to design the inspection system (dispersion characteristics, excitation frequency, propagating modes etc.). In this part, the FEA driven design approach was first validated with self measured experimental data as well as experiments provided in literature. In the second step, the numerical model was applied for the performance of parameter studies in order to identify component specific aspects that proved important for the NDT process. Finally, general advices and FEA related working steps were derived from all findings to assist practitioners in the implementation of the technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department Adhesive Bonding Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, Bremen, Germany

Department Adhesive Bonding Technology, Hillger NDT GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany

Department Adhesive Bonding Technology, INVENT Innovative Composites Realisation and Marketing of New Technologies GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09243046.2022.214704210.1080/09243046.2022.2147042 ↗
2. Irving PE, Soutis C. Polymer composites in the aerospace industry. 2nd ed. Duxford United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2020.
3. 10.1177/073168441984970810.1177/0731684419849708 ↗
4. Samui P, Kim D, Iyer NR, et al. New materials in civil engineering. San Diego CA: Elsevier Science; 2020.
5. 10.1177/095440541561934310.1177/0954405415619343 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.00710.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.007 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199831982709110.1177/0021998319827091 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.10910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.109 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.02.00610.1016/j.infrared.2015.02.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10883910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108839 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.00810.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008 ↗
12. Whitney JM. Analysis of the test methods for high modulus fibers and composites ; American society for testing & materials. Place of publication not identified. 1973.10.1520/STP521-EB ↗
13. Fahr A, Guitard P, Matthes I. Ultrasonic C-scan inspection of composite materials. Die Pharmazie. 1992;47(9):699–704.
14. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00094-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00094-9 ↗
15. 10.1109/ICIC.2010.16910.1109/ICIC.2010.169 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.01110.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.011 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/31010.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.02010.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.020 ↗
19. 10.1098/rspa.1917.000810.1098/rspa.1917.0008 ↗
20. 10.1201/b1226010.1201/b12260 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-319-49715-010.1007/978-3-319-49715-0 ↗
22. 10.1121/1.135781310.1121/1.1357813 ↗
23. 10.1121/1.41719310.1121/1.417193 ↗
24. 10.1177/1045389X0505010610.1177/1045389X05050106 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab85e010.1088/1361-665X/ab85e0 ↗
26. 10.1121/1.353374210.1121/1.3533742 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10611410.1016/j.ultras.2020.106114 ↗
28. 10.1177/147592171351397510.1177/1475921713513975 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-981-10-0564-010.1007/978-981-10-0564-0 ↗
30. Dilligen O. Interaction between fundamental Lamb modes and defects in plates. London: Dissertation, University of London; 2003.
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000106010.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001060 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.07610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.076 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/00310.1088/0964-1726/16/2/003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.07.00610.1016/j.ultras.2014.07.006 ↗
35. Nissabouri S, El Allami M, Boutyour EH. Modelling of lamb waves propagation in orthotropic plate. In: Patnaik S, Zbitou J, Pruncu CI, et al., editors. Handbook of research on recent developments in electrical and mechanical. Place of publication not identified: ENGINEERING Science REFER; 2019. p. 315–340.
36. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.04.00310.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.04.003 ↗
37. Seher M, Huthwaite P, Lowe M, et al. Numerical design optimization of an EMAT for A0 Lamb wave generation in steel plates. AIP Conf Proc. 2015;1581:340–347.
38. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.47710.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.477 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.015 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.055 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.039 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11463910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114639 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.01110.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.011 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.07210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.072 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.67610.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.676 ↗
46. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/6/06500910.1088/0964-1726/19/6/065009 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.05.00410.1016/j.ultras.2017.05.004 ↗
48. 10.1177/14644207042180020410.1177/146442070421800204 ↗
49. 10.1121/1.492270110.1121/1.4922701 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.323824710.1063/1.3238247 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.020 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.13610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.136 ↗
53. Hu N, Elmarakbi AM, Alamusi, et al. Numerical simulation of damages in FRP laminated structures under transverse quasi-static or low-velocity impact loads. In Advanced composite materials for automotive applications: structural integrity and crashworthines. Elmarakbi A, Ed. Wiley: Hoboken; 2014. p. 257–292.
54. 10.1088/1757-899X/242/1/01208810.1088/1757-899X/242/1/012088 ↗
55. Mook G, Pohl J, Simonin Y. International Committee for Non-Destructive Testing. WCNDT 2016; German society for non-destructive testing. In: Lamb wave interactions in CFRP plates. Berlin: DGZfP; 2016.
56. Lin W, Goh LS, Wang Q, et al. Detection of abnormalities in composites using anti-symmetric mode of lamb wave. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace; Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Ed., Singapore. 2013.
57. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/2/02500610.1088/0964-1726/19/2/025006 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.04.02410.1016/j.ultras.2016.04.024 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.32210.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.322 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.01.01210.1016/j.ultras.2015.01.012 ↗