Natural stone in the 14th–15th-Century secular buildings of the Novgorod Kremlin
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A study of the natural stone in the masonry of secular buildings – two palaces of Novgorodian archbishops from the 14th and 15th centuries – was made as part of the extensive archaeological and restoration work in the Novgorod Kremlin that began in 2006. The two structures are unique among mediaeval Novgorodian architecture of the 12th–15th centuries, other surviving examples of which are exclusively church buildings. The aim of the study was to determine whether the intended function of a building had on the particularities of the selection of types of stone and the choice of quarry sites. The main methods of study were laboratory analyses (thin section microscopy, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis). which showed that the durable, but hard to work, limestone used in the walls of the buildings was quarried for the most part from the Il’men Clint, 50 km from Novgorod on the other side of Lake Il’men. For paving floors, however, the builders used trimmed slabs of limestone obtained in a different place, possibly on the River Shelon’, 70 km from Novgorod or further afield. A comparison with other works of Novgorodian architecture from the 12th–15th centuries showed that this sort of differentiation between sources for building stone was established practice, as was the use of those particular quarry sites. In the course of this work, we developed a methodology for the identification of limestone that we recommend for use in further studies of the building stone used in Novgorodian architecture. The results obtained are proving important for the resolution of practical tasks in the restoration of Novgorod’s architectural monuments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. The Faceted Palace in Novgorod The Great: the main problems of restoration
2. First secular masonry buildings of the Novgorodian Archbishop’s court: written sources and archaeological data10.3176/arch.2019.2.03 ↗
3. Antipov, I., and Yakovlev, D. 2019. = Антипов, И. В., Яковлев Д. Е. Tёплый дом новгородского архиепископа: система отопления во Владычной палате 1433 года // Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства. T. IX. Cанкт-Петербург: Cанкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 446–457. DOI: 10.18688/aa199-3-39.10.18688/aa199-3-39 ↗
4. The cross-cultural interaction in Baltic region in the fifteenth century: the vaults of the Faceted Palace in Novgorod the Great and the Brick Gothic architecture
5. Gladenko, T.V. et al. 1964. = Гладенко T.В., Красноречьев Л.Е., Штендер Г.M., Шуляк Л.M. Архитектура Hовгорода в свете последних исследований. Hовгород. К 1100-летию города. Cборник статей. Mосква, Hаука, 183-263.
6. Rappoport · 1995 · 230
7. Poppe, A. 1961 = Поппэ А. В. Порядная запись 1420 г. на постройку церкви св. Tроицы на Клопске (К вопросу об одном из источников жития Mихаила Клопского). Проблемы источниковедения, 9, 386—407.
8. Shtender, G. M. 1986 = Штендер, Г.M. Древняя строительная техника как метод изучения русского зодчества. Архитектурное наследие и реставрация, Mосква, 9-31.
9. Features of carbonate-terrigenous sedimentation in the Semiluki time in the eastern part of the Main Devonian Field
10. Tarasenko, A.B., and Shishlov, S.B. 2012 = Tарасенко А.Б., Шишлов C.Б. Литолого-генетические особенности ильменских и бурегских слоев франского яруса в районе южного берега озера Ильмень, Pегион. Геология и металлогения, 49, 47-55.
11. Rusetskaya, G. A., et al. 2013 = Pусецкая Г.А., Tарасенко А.Б., Вербицкий В.P., Xрамов А.H., Журавлев А.В., Евдокимова И.O., Иосифиди А.Г., Tомша В.А., Cокиран Е.В. Cтратотип Бурегских слоев (франский ярус, главное девонское поле). Литосфера, 5, 42-56.
12. The Lake Il’men Clint, Russia: a potential Devonian geopark10.31897/pmi.2018.6.581 ↗
13. Perens · 2003-2010
14. Conservation of building and decorative Stone
15. Doehne · 2010
16. Provenance, durability and damage analysis of natural building stones by means of petrographical techniques
17. Building stones can be of geoheritage significance10.1007/s12371-017-0274-8 ↗
18. Geochemical and petrographic identification of stone quarries used for the construction of the Anahita Temple of Kangavar (West Iran)10.1186/s40494-020-0361-z ↗
19. Azancheev, Ju. 1894 = Азанчеев Ю. Каменоломни и разработки простых полезных ископаемых в Pоссии. Cанкт-Петербург, Tиполитография и фототипия В.И.Штейна, 1894. 348.
20. Sorokin, V. S. 1978 = Cорокин, В.C. Этапы развития Cеверо-Запада Pусской платформы во франском веке. Pига, Зинатне, 282 с.
21. Tarasenko, A.B. 2012 = Tарасенко А.Б. Oсобенности строения и обстановки формирования отложений франского яруса в Приильменской части Главного девонского поля, Автореферат диссертации на соискание учёной степени кандидата геолого-минералогических наук. Cанкт-Петербург, 21 с.
22. Ziskind, M.S. 1989. = Зискинд, M.C. Декоративно-облицовочные камни. Ленинград, Hедра, 255 с.