journal article·2016-07

An acoustical measurement used for the understanding of historical wind instruments

P. Eveno, S. Le Conte

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract For conservation reasons, wind musical instruments kept in most of the museums cannot be played. Indeed the musician, blowing into the instrument, causes a violent thermo-hygro gradient that could damage this cultural heritage. Nevertheless, it is interesting to still be able to collect acoustical information about playing techniques or tuning without playing these historical musical instruments. In the museum context when the acoustical value (among every cultural values) is relevant, a facsimile could be ordered to a maker. Less time consuming and less expensive the measure of the input impedance is a good technique to evaluate the acoustical behaviour of reduced to silence instruments. This measurement is used in the Musee de la musique to survey the technical evolution of an instrument family along its history. This article deals with the serpent family. The serpent is a wind instrument which used to be played from the 16th to the 19th century. It was revived in the second half of the 20th century. There is a large variety of serpents (different shapes, different number of holes, provided or not with keys…) kept in the collection of the Musee de la musique. Input impedance measurements show that, despite the geometry evolution and/or the holes number, a common acoustical behaviour can be pointed out for all the family members. The results show that serpents are difficult to play in tune and that all their evolutions (change of shape, addition of keys…) did not bring any improvement in the ease of playing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Music Technology and Sound Studies · Music and Audio Processing · Neuroscience and Music Perception

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Norman · 2010
2. Campbell · 2005
3. Dalmont · 2012
4. Investigating the consistency of woodwind instrument manufacturing by comparing five nominally identical oboes10.1121/1.3651088 ↗
5. Evaluating the suitability of acoustical measurement techniques and psychophysical testing for studying the consistency of musical wind instrument manufacturing10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.01.013 ↗
6. Impedance comparison of high-quality alto and soprano saxophones10.1121/1.4779214 ↗
7. Dalmont · 2011
8. Eveno · 2012
9. 2014
10. Acoustic impedance measurements, Part I: a review10.1006/jsvi.2000.3428 ↗
11. Survey of impedance methods and a new piezodisk-driven impedance head for air columns10.1121/1.394636 ↗
12. Widholm · 1989
13. Acoustical impedance measurements by the two microphone three- calibration (TMTC) method10.1121/1.399975 ↗
14. Wideband measurement of the acoustic impedance of tubular objects
15. Le Roux · 2008
16. Trumpet with near-perfect harmonicity: design and acoustic results10.1121/1.3518769 ↗
17. The relationship between bore resonance frequencies and playing frequencies in trumpets10.3813/AAA.918715 ↗
18. The musician's guide to acoustics, chapter 9
19. Intonation et résonances acoustiques des cornets à bouquin et des serpents [Intonation and acoustic resonance in the cornett and serpent]
20. Cornett acoustics: some experimental studies10.2307/842398 ↗
21. chapter The Woodwinds: I
22. Eveno · 2013
23. La méthode de serpent de Jean-Baptiste Métoyen : héritages et évolutions [the serpent tutor of Jean-Baptiste Métoyen: heritage and evolution
24. Les formes dérivées du serpent dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle [The derived forms of the serpent in the first half of the XIXth century]
25. Gossec · 1814
26. Classification of musical instruments10.2307/842168 ↗