journal article·2026-03Open access

Exploring funerary heritage through augmented reality: A training application for the micro-excavation of funerary urns in the laboratory

Lorena Zaragoza, Josep Benedito, Jose Manuel Melchor, Elisabetta Interdonato, M.-Carmen Juan

Abstract

• AR for micro-excavation of funerary urns in the laboratory for archaeology students. • High-fidelity AR replicas of urns, bones, and grave goods were digitally created. • AR enables safe, hands-on practice with fragile, scarce archaeological items. • AR bridges theory and practical archaeological training. • AR supports effective learning with low workload and excellent user experience. The excavation of funerary urns is a delicate and complex archaeological task that demands both technical skill and cultural sensitivity. However, hands-on training with real urns is limited due to their fragility and scarcity. This research presents the design, development, and evaluation of a novel augmented reality (AR) application that simulates the micro-excavation of funerary urns in the laboratory for archaeology students. The AR application digitally replicates authentic archaeological objects and excavation procedures, creating an immersive learning environment that preserves the integrity of original artifacts. By digitalizing real archaeological materials, our approach ensures high fidelity and accuracy, allowing students to engage with realistic replicas that enhance both educational value and cultural heritage preservation. The application was developed within the context of the European project ArchaeoPills, focused on practical archaeological training in higher education. The application was validated in an international archaeology course attended by 19 students. The following conclusions are drawn from the data obtained in the study and subsequently analyzed. The AR application effectively supported knowledge acquisition. The students reported a low perceived workload and an excellent user experience. The results for all of the variables analyzed were independent of gender and age. Correlation analysis shows that: (1) higher workload is associated with lower user experience; (2) cognitive and emotional strain (e.g., frustration, effort) reduces presence; and (3) presence increases with lower frustration, greater usability, and balanced cognitive demands. Our proposal bridges theoretical knowledge and practical experience while promoting cultural heritage through hands-on, repeatable training. The findings highlight the potential of AR to transform archaeological education and promote wider cultural heritage dissemination and conservation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Cremated bone in archaeology: ethical considerations in the excavation, analysis, storage, and display of cremated bone in the United Kingdom10.1002/oa.3382 ↗
2. Metaverse and XR for cultural heritage education: applications, standards, architecture, and technological insights for enhanced immersive experience10.1007/s10055-025-01126-z ↗
3. The Impact of immersive technologies on cultural heritage: a bibliometric study of VR, AR, and MR applications
4. Grand challenges in immersive technologies for cultural heritage
5. Arqueología colaborativa: conservación y análisis de una urna funeraria, Traslasierra, Córdoba, Argentina
6. McKinley · 2020 · 2726
7. 2017
8. Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: an overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation10.1371/journal.pone.0310380 ↗
9. From death to deposition: the sequence of ritual in cremation burials of the roman period
10. Thompson · 2015
11. W. Van Andringa, T. Creissen, Mourir à Pompéi: Fouille d’un Quartier Funéraire de la Nécropole Romaine de Porta Nocera (2003-2007), École Française de Rome, Rome, 2013. https://digital.casalini.it/9782728309139.
12. Protohistoric metal-urn cremation burials (1400–100 BC): a pan-European phenomenon10.15184/aqy.2022.109 ↗
13. Rare archaeological evidence of early modern cremation burials and mixed burial practices in a suburban parish churchyard10.1007/s10761-025-00787-5 ↗
14. W. Gibson, I. Account of a Burial Urn, discovered at Colney, in Norfolk, in a Letter from the Rev. William Gibson, M. A. and F. A. S. to the Rev. John Brand, Secretary, Archaeologia 14 (1803) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261340900027120.10.1017/S0261340900027120 ↗
15. To burn or bury? that Is the question: the late Bronze Age and Iron Age in Northern Europe
16. The phoenician cemetery of Tyre
17. Newcomb · 2025
18. Torruclés (Burriana, España). Nuevos datos, nuevas propuestas sobre la ocupación del litoral de Castellón en época romana
19. Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: design and a first test of a questionnaire
20. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research
21. Reference values and subscale patterns for the task load index (TLX): a meta-analytic review10.1080/00140139.2021.1876927 ↗
22. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire
23. Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ)
24. Comparison of visual and multisensory augmented reality for precise manual manipulation tasks10.1016/j.displa.2024.102768 ↗
25. Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.001 ↗
26. New technologies in psychological intervention for adolescents with type I diabetes: a systematic review10.1007/s12144-024-05694-2 ↗
27. The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015 ↗
28. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 ↗
29. Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study10.1111/jcal.12071 ↗
30. An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities
31. Predicting quality in educational software: evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00063-0 ↗
32. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 ↗