Thermal deformation constraint using response surfaces for optimization of stacking sequences of composite laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminates are used extensively in aerospace structures. The laminated CFRP composite structures require optimal design of the stacking sequences. Modifications to the stacking sequences change the thermal deformation that results from the CFRP laminate curing process. Even if a stacking sequence provides maximum buckling load, the laminate is unacceptable if it displays large deformations after the curing process. Therefore, this study deals with the constraint of thermal deformation after the curing process. Maximization of the buckling load was targeted as the objective function here. Three types of response surfaces were proposed to estimate the thermal deformation and their fit was investigated. The mode classification method was found to be excellent. Using the mode classification response surface, a stacking sequence optimization to maximize the buckling stress was performed. The new mode classification method was shown to be appropriate for optimization of the curing process constraints. Keywords: bucklinglaminatesthermal deformationoptimization
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Miki M · ASTM STP. · 1985 · 846 · 387
2. Fukunaga H · AIAA J. · 1992 · 30 · 279110.2514/3.11304 ↗
3. Le Riche R · AIAA J. · 1993 · 31 · 95110.2514/3.11710 ↗
4. Nagendra S · Comput. Struct. · 1996 · 58 · 54310.1016/0045-7949(95)00160-I ↗
5. Liu B · Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. · 2000 · 186 · 35710.1016/S0045-7825(99)90391-2 ↗
6. Park JH · Compos. Struct. · 2001 · 52 · 21710.1016/S0263-8223(00)00170-7 ↗
7. Soremekun G · Compos. Struct. · 2002 · 56 · 5310.1016/S0263-8223(01)00185-4 ↗
8. Cho MH · AIAA J. · 2003 · 41 · 227410.2514/2.6821 ↗
9. Kang JH · Compos. Struct. · 2005 · 69 · 23910.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.001 ↗
10. Herencia JE · AIAA J. · 2007 · 45 · 249710.2514/1.26321 ↗
11. Liu X · Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 217 · 179
12. Narita Y · J. Sound Vib. · 2003 · 263 · 100510.1016/S0022-460X(03)00270-0 ↗
13. Terada Y · JSME Int. J., Ser. A. · 2001 · 44 · 49010.1299/jsmea.44.490 ↗
14. Todoroki A · AIAA J. · 2001 · 42 · 14110.2514/1.9038 ↗
15. Sekishiro M · Adv. Compos. Mater. · 2006 · 15 · 34110.1163/156855106778392098 ↗
16. Hirano Y · Adv. Compos. Mater. · 2004 · 13 · 8910.1163/1568551041718044 ↗
17. Todoroki A · AIAA J. · 2008 · 46 · 225710.2514/1.34548 ↗
18. Todoroki A · J. Comp. Sci. Technol., JSME. · 2007 · 1 · 2210.1299/jcst.1.22 ↗
19. Todoroki A · J. Comp. Sci. Technol., JSME. · 2011 · 5 · 2610.1299/jcst.5.26 ↗
20. Todoroki A · J. Comp. Sci. Technol., JSME. · 2008 · 2 · 23410.1299/jcst.2.234 ↗
21. Todoroki A · Compos. Struct. · 2004 · 64 · 34910.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.004 ↗
22. Todoroki A · Adv. Compos. Mater. · 2002 · 11 · 29910.1163/156855102762506335 ↗