Structural and optical studies of thick freestanding GaN films deposited by Hydride vapor phase epitaxy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thick freestanding films or bulk GaN substrates with very low background impurity levels (≤1×1015/cm3) and high crystalline quality are required for a number of electronic device applications. Low pressure chemical vapor and molecular beam epitaxy techniques can systematically deposit films with low residual impurity concentrations. However, their typical slow growth rate prevents their utilization for substrate growth. The hydride vapor phase epitaxy deposition technique can achieve hundreds of microns per hour growth rate, but these films have typically high free carrier concentration (≥3×1017/cm3). It is crucial to verify if this method can reproducibly deliver thick freestanding GaN films of high crystalline quality with exceptionally low free carrier concentration. Low temperature photoluminescence and room temperature Raman scattering experiments carried out on a number of samples indicate that they have high crystalline quality and uncommonly low donor background levels. Reduced concentration of uncompensated shallow donors verified by low temperature electron paramagnetic resonance was confirmed by detailed high sensitive SIMS analyses. In addition, it was verified by X-ray diffraction analysis that relatively low dislocation densities can be achieved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Freitas · Journal of Crystal Growth · 2008 · 310 · 396810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.06.038 ↗
2. Freitas · Journal of Crystal Growth · 2010 · 312 · 261610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.04.022 ↗
3. Kang · Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B · 2004 · 22 · 71010.1116/1.1689303 ↗
4. Maier · Materials Science Forum · 1994 · 143–147 · 9310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.143-147.93 ↗
5. Baranov · Solid State Communications · 1997 · 101 · 61110.1016/S0038-1098(96)00667-9 ↗
6. Chow · Physical Review Letters · 2000 · 85 · 276110.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2761 ↗
7. Son · Physical Review B · 2009 · 80 · 15320210.1103/PhysRevB.80.153202 ↗
8. Carlos · Physical Review B · 1993 · 48 · 1787810.1103/PhysRevB.48.17878 ↗
9. Glaser · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 08531210.1103/PhysRevB.65.085312 ↗
10. Moran · Reports on Progress in Physics · 2009 · 72 · 03650210.1088/0034-4885/72/3/036502 ↗
11. Lee · Applied Physics Letters · 2005 · 86 · 24190410.1063/1.1947367 ↗
12. Bergman · 2000
13. Perlin · Applied Physics Letters · 1995 · 67 · 252410.1063/1.114446 ↗
14. Bergman · Physical Review B · 1999 · 59 · 1297710.1103/PhysRevB.59.12977 ↗
15. Freitas · Physical Review B · 2002 · 66 · 23331110.1103/PhysRevB.66.233311 ↗
16. Green · Journal of Applied Physics · 2004 · 95 · 845610.1063/1.1755431 ↗
17. Wickenden · Journal of Electronic Materials · 2000 · 29 · R114
18. Liu · Applied Physics Letters · 2005 · 86 · 02190810.1063/1.1852085 ↗
19. Paskov · Journalof Applied Physics · 2005 · 98 · 09351910.1063/1.2128496 ↗
20. Murthy · Journal of Crystal Growth · 2007 · 305 · 39310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.03.029 ↗