journal article·2021-03-04

Fatigue and impact strengths of kenaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: effects of fibre treatments

Oscar Asumani, Ratnam Paskaramoorthy

Advanced Composite Materials· Volume 30· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of two fibre treatments (alkali-alone treatment and combined alkali-silane treatment) on the fatigue and impact strengths of kenaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites are investigated. Test results showed that fibre treatments improve the fatigue and impact strengths of the composites, with alkali-silane treatment being the most effective one. Alkali concentration of 5% to 6% is found to be the optimal concentration for both alkali-alone and combined alkali-silane treatments. Microscopy examination revealed that the damage mechanisms of the composites are significantly influenced by the fibre treatment. The failure modes of alkali-alone treated kenaf/PP composites are predominantly characterized by fibre pull-outs, suggesting poor fibre-matrix adhesion; whereas the failure modes of alkali-silane treated kenaf/PP composites are characterised by fibre breakage and matrix cracks indicating improved fibre-matrix adhesion due to the additional silane treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials and School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Suddell BC. · 2008 · 71
2. Globalissues.org. [Internet]. [cited 2012 Jan 4]. Available from: http://globalissues.org/article/797/cop17-durban-climate-conference/
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
5. 10.1080/09243046.2013.87117710.1080/09243046.2013.871177 ↗
6. 10.1163/156855112X62954010.1163/156855112X629540 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053 ↗
8. 10.1163/15685540175325542210.1163/156855401753255422 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00116-610.1016/S1359-835X(01)00116-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.04910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.049 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.016 ↗
14. Mohd Yuhazri Y, Phongsakorn PT, Sihombing H, et al. Mechanical properties of kenaf/polyester composites. Int J Engine Tech. 2011;11:01.
15. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Standard No. ASTM D3039-M:2008.
16. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM): standard test methods for determining the izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. Standard No. ASTM D256-10:2010.
17. British Standard (BS). Fibre-reinforced plastics: Determination of fatigue properties under cyclic loading conditions. Standard No. BS ISO 13003:2003.
18. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for tension-tension fatigue of polymer matrix composite materials. Standard No. ASTM D3479-M:2007.