Effect of Particle Size and Shape on Wall Slip of Highly Filled Powder Feedstocks for Material Extrusion and Powder Injection Molding
Source abstract
Abstract
A necessity to distinguish between the influence of powder shape and size (particle size distribution) is especially demanding for highly filled metal powder feedstocks employed in additive manufacturing and powder injection molding. As their processability is evaluated through rheological behavior, the study focuses on the effect of powder size/shape on a wall slip, which is a typical phenomenon determining flow performance of these materials. Water and gas atomized 17-4PH stainless steel powders with D 50 of about 3 and 20 μm are admixed into a binder containing low-density polyethylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, and paraffin wax. Mooney analysis to intercept the slip velocity of 55 vol. % filled compounds reveals that wall slip effect appears to vary significantly with size and shape of metal powders—round shaped and large particles are the most prone to the wall slip. However, the evaluation is affected by the type of the flow streams resulting from the geometry of the dies—conical dies reduce the slip up to 60% in case of fine and round particles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre of Polymer Systems, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Zlin, Czech Republic.
Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Zlin, Czech Republic.
Indo MIM Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10991010.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109910 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1105084010.3390/ma11050840 ↗
3. Kukla C Gonzalez-Gutierrez J Cano S et al. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) of PIM feedstocks. In: VI Congreso Nacional de Pulvimetalurgia y I Congreso Iberoamericano de Pulvimetalurgia. 7–9 June 2017. Ciudad Real. Spain. 2017. 1–6.
4. Sa'ude N, , Masood SH, , Nikzad M, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of copper-ABS composites for FDM feedstock. Int J Eng Res Appl, 2013; 3:1257–1263.
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009 ↗
6. Giberti H, , Strano M, , Annoni M. An innovative machine for Fused Deposition Modeling of metals and advanced ceramics. In: International Conference on Nano and Materials Science. 1–2 April 2016. Prague. Czech Republic. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2016; 43:03003.
7. 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.01010.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.02.02010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.02.020 ↗
9. Heaney DF. Handbook of Metal Injection Molding. Cambridge UK: Woodhead Publishing 2012.10.1533/9780857096234 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)01100-710.1016/S0924-0136(02)01100-7 ↗
11. 10.1179/00325890422502071010.1179/003258904225020710 ↗
12. Park SJ, , Ahn S, , Kang TG, et al. A review of computer simulations in powder injection molding. Int J Powder Metall, 2010; 46:37–46.
13. 10.1002/pen.1092610.1002/pen.10926 ↗
14. 10.1002/pen.2192810.1002/pen.21928 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.04910.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.049 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10075410.1016/j.apmt.2020.100754 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00397-005-0036-410.1007/s00397-005-0036-4 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0018410.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00184 ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0079310.3389/fbioe.2020.00793 ↗
20. 10.1122/1.503768710.1122/1.5037687 ↗
21. 10.1002/polb.1009310.1002/polb.10093 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10570-018-1963-410.1007/s10570-018-1963-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10196710.1016/j.addma.2021.101967 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.05310.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.053 ↗
25. 10.1111/jace.1630510.1111/jace.16305 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10763410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107634 ↗
27. Kotsilkova R Tabakova S Ivanova R. Effect of graphene nanoplatelets and multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the viscous and viscoelastic properties and printability of polylactide nanocomposites. Mech Time Depend Mater 2021 DOI: 10.1007/s11043-021-09503-2.10.1007/s11043-021-09503-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.03.04410.1016/j.powtec.2007.03.044 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.26510.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.265 ↗
30. 10.1016/0377-0257(94)01282-M10.1016/0377-0257(94)01282-M ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.08.00710.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.08.007 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0113460210.1007/BF01134602 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.005 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.1993.07050070710.1002/app.1993.070500707 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.00610.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.006 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1103043210.3390/polym11030432 ↗
37. 10.1122/1.55053710.1122/1.550537 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.2546810.1002/app.25468 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.01.02110.1016/j.compfluid.2017.01.021 ↗
40. German RM. Metal Injection Molding. Princeton NJ: Metal Powder Industries Federation 2011.
41. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.00110.1016/j.addma.2019.01.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.02310.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.023 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.05810.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.058 ↗
44. 10.1122/1.211636410.1122/1.2116364 ↗
45. 10.1122/1.179517110.1122/1.1795171 ↗
46. 10.1122/1.486629510.1122/1.4866295 ↗
47. Hwang KS. Common defects in metal injection molding (MIM). In: Heaney DF. (ed.) Handbook of Metal Injection Molding. Sawston UK: Woodhead Publishing 2012; pp.235–253.10.1533/9780857096234.2.235 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.11.04110.1016/j.powtec.2017.11.041 ↗
49. 10.1515/POLYENG.2000.20.4.23710.1515/POLYENG.2000.20.4.237 ↗
50. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.52-54.9710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.52-54.97 ↗
51. 10.1179/1743290114Y.000000010110.1179/1743290114Y.0000000101 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00151-810.1016/S0167-577X(00)00151-8 ↗
53. 10.1080/10408436.2013.80898610.1080/10408436.2013.808986 ↗
54. Thornagel M. MIM-simulation: A virtual study on phase separation. In: International Powder Metallurgy Congress & Exhibition. 2009. Copenhagen. Denmark: European Powder Metallurgy Association 2009; pp.135–140.
55. Gonzalez-Gutierrez J Stringari G Emri I. Powder injection molding of metal and ceramic parts. In: Wang J. (ed.) Some Critical Issues for Injection Molding. IntechOpen UK 2012; pp.65–86.10.5772/38070 ↗
56. Chin RJ, , Lai SH, , Ibrahim S, et al. Factors affect wall slip: Particle size, concentration and temperature. Appl Rheol, 2018; 28:15775.
57. 10.1007/s11665-019-04276-910.1007/s11665-019-04276-9 ↗
58. 10.3390/app1022799310.3390/app10227993 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.10433610.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104336 ↗
60. 10.1002/app.119810.1002/app.1198 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.08.00410.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.08.004 ↗
62. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981017)70:3<515::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981017)70:3<515::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-# ↗