Monotonic and Cyclic Compression Tests on Concrete Confined with PET-FRP
Source abstract
Abstract
Given developments in the construction material industry, existing knowledge of concrete confined with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) must be validated for newly developed FRP-type materials. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which has a high ultimate tensile strain, is a relatively new type of fiber. Given the limited number of studies on PET-FRP, the goal of this study is to observe and define the mechanical behavior of PET-FRP-confined concrete specimens subjected to monotonic/cyclic compression loading. In this study, the behavior of concrete confined with PET-FRP is compared with the behavior of concrete confined with other types of FRP. The general form of the compression stress-strain relationship of PET-FRP-confined concrete consists of two parts that are connected with a transition part, which is similar to concrete confined with other FRP types. Additionally, to understand whether available models are able to predict the compressive behavior of PET-FRP-confined concrete, the predictions from four models are compared with the corresponding test results. The results indicate that the compression stress–axial strain relationship of PET-confined concrete is not predicted in a sufficient manner using the four models.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Istanbul 34469, Turkey.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.011 ↗
2. Stress-strain behavior of concrete under cyclic loading
3. Cyclic compressive behavior of concrete confined with large rupture strain FRP composites
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.029 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000023010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000230 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.058 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.001 ↗
9. 10.1080/1363246030935045510.1080/13632460309350455 ↗
10. 10.12989/sem.2004.18.2.16710.12989/sem.2004.18.2.167 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.014 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(583)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(583) ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.025 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(1025)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(1025) ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-8368(00)00021-410.1016/S1359-8368(00)00021-4 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0248209010.1007/BF02482090 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11029-006-0040-510.1007/s11029-006-0040-5 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000001210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000012 ↗
20. Investigation of concentrically loaded reinforced concrete columns confined with glass-fibre reinforced polymer jackets
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139) ↗
22. 10.1177/073168440303543010.1177/0731684403035430 ↗