Sustained-Load and Fatigue Performance of a Hybrid FRP-Concrete Bridge Deck System
Source abstract
Abstract
The design and construction of bridge systems with long-term durability and low maintenance requirements is a significant challenge for bridge engineers. One possible solution to this challenge could be through the use of new materials, e.g., fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, with traditional materials that are arranged as an innovative hybrid structural system where the FRP serves as a load-carrying constituent and a protective cover for the concrete. This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation designed to evaluate the performance of a 3/4 scale hybrid FRP-concrete (HFRPC) bridge deck and composite connection under sustained and repeated (fatigue) loading. In addition, following the sustained-load and fatigue portions of the experimental study, destructive testing was performed to determine the first strength-based limit state of the hybrid deck. Results from the sustained-load and fatigue testing suggest that the HFRPC deck system might be a viable alternative to traditional cast-in-place reinforced concrete decks showing no global creep behavior and no degradation in stiffness or composite action between the deck and steel girders after 2 million cycles of dynamic loading with a peak load of 1.26 times the scaled tandem load (TL). Furthermore, the ultimate strength test showed that the deck failed prior to the global superstructure at a load approximately six times the scaled TL.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author).
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (1998). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications 2nd Ed. Washington D.C.
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.005 ↗
3. Alnahhal W. I. (2007). “Structural characteristics and failure prediction of hybrid FRP-concrete bridge superstructure and deck systems.” Ph.D. thesis State Univ. of New York Univ. at Buffalo Buffalo N.Y.
4. Aref A. J. (1997). “A novel fiber reinforced composite bridge structural system.” Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Urbana-Champaign Ill.
5. 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90189-810.1016/0956-7151(91)90189-8 ↗
6. ASTM. (2000). “Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the field.” ASTM-C 31/C 31M-00 West Conshohocken Pa.
7. ASTM. (2001). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” ASTM-C 39/C 39M-01 West Conshohocken Pa.
8. Bakeri P. A. and Sunder S. S. (1990). “Concepts for hybrid FRP bridge deck systems.” Proc. 1st Materials Engineering Congress Serviceability and Durability of Construction Materials Vol. 2 ASCE Reston Va. 1006–1015.
9. Busel J. P. · 2000
10. Cook R. D. · 1985
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1079)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1079) ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1069)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1069) ↗
13. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration. (2003). “2003 status of the nation’s highways bridges and transit: Conditions and performance-report to Congress.” http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2002cpr/report.htm (Oct. 3 2003).
14. Hillman J. R. and Murray T. M. (1990). “Innovative floor system for steel framed buildings.” Proc. IABSE Symp. Mixed Structures Including New Materials Vol. 60 672–675.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(182)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(182) ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(26)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(26) ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(762)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(762) ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(33)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(33) ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(279)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(279) ↗
20. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00127-610.1016/S0263-8223(00)00127-6 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.016 ↗