Residual Load-Carrying Capacity of Hybrid FRP-UHPC-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Column after Lateral Impact
Source abstract
Abstract
The hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)–concrete–steel double-skin tubular column (DSTC) is an innovative composite member consisting of an outer FRP tube and an inner steel tube, with the space between them filled with concrete. The incorporation of ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) in the DSTC yields numerous advantages over the DSTC with normal-strength concrete, particularly in terms of enhanced impact resistance. While the lateral impact behavior of UHPC DSTC has been investigated, its residual performance after lateral impact remains unexplored. To comprehend the postimpact behavior of UHPC DSTC, a series of specimens underwent lateral impact, followed by static axial compression. Additionally, intact specimens were subjected to static axial compression for comparative analysis. Subsequently, refined numerical models were developed and validated using the obtained test data. Detailed parametric studies were carried out to investigate the influences of key variables on the postimpact behavior of UHPC DSTCs. Finally, based on the ratio of residual midheight deflection to the column height, a prediction formula was proposed for the rapid damage evaluation of impacted UHPC DSTCs, and threshold values for different damage levels were suggested based on a defined damage index.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210098, China.
Professor, College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210098, China (corresponding author).
Research Fellow, Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000070010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000700 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.04810.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.048 ↗
3. AS (Australian Standard). 2014. Methods of testing concrete—Method 9: Determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens. AS 1012.9. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Standard.
4. ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for determining tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites used for strengthening of civil structures. ASTM D7565/D7565M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
5. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.003 ↗
6. BSI (British Standards Institution). 1987 Method for tensile testing of metals (including aerospace materials). BS18. London: British Standards Institution.
7. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-408610.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4086 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10694110.1016/j.tws.2020.106941 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10518510.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105185 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000232410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002324 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11571910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115719 ↗
12. Hallquist, J. 2017. LS-DYNA Keyword user’s manual, version: R10. 0. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
13. 10.1017/CBO978051182062510.1017/CBO9780511820625 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.11005510.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110055 ↗
15. 10.1177/1369433223117926810.1177/13694332231179268 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11251910.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112519 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10358410.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103584 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11384010.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113840 ↗
19. Nanjing Hitech Composites. 2023. “Dongping Industrial Park Lishui Nanjing Jiangsu Province China.” Accessed July 13 2023. http://www.hitechfrp.com/haituo/indexyw.asp/.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000040110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000401 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000098110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000981 ↗
22. 10.1177/136943322199771610.1177/1369433221997716 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11442910.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114429 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.06.02210.1016/j.tws.2015.06.022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.10742610.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107426 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.10331410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103314 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.04810.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.048 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000105710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001057 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.06210.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.062 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10982210.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109822 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000068610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000686 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.10774110.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107741 ↗
35. 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-590110.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5901 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11239610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112396 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11328410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113284 ↗
38. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-405510.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4055 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.00510.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.005 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000012110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000121 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10800610.1016/j.jobe.2023.108006 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.00210.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.002 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000080010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000800 ↗