journal article·2024-12

Finite-Element Analysis of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Frame Knee Joints under Closing Loads

Amin Izadi, Graeme Milligan, Ryan Barrage, Maria Anna Polak, Arndt Goldack

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical investigation of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforced concrete knee joints subjected to closing moments, with a focus on reinforcement ratio, joint geometry, and confinement stirrups. The study uses the finite-element method with a commercially available code to verify experimental tests and examines the behavior of the knee joints through a parametric study. The concrete damaged plasticity model was used to define the material behavior of concrete, and the effects of different dilation angles were also studied. The average test-to-predicted ratios between finite-element analyses and test results fall within a range of 2% for moment capacities and 5% for deflections at peak. The results indicate that the dilation angle significantly influences the moment capacity and the ultimate deflection of specimens. Proper reinforcement detailing and concrete confinement are found to be important in knee joints, as unconfined specimens failed at significantly lower strengths than their confined counterparts. Incorporating diagonal stirrups in the knee joints is shown to be more effective than utilizing lateral stirrups in enhancing both moment capacity and deflections of the specimens under closing moments. However, placement of lateral stirrups is more practical than diagonal stirrups and it is shown that lateral stirrups increase the capacity of the joints to acceptable levels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada.

Structural EIT, Dillon Consulting Ltd., Kitchener, ON N2H 5G5, Canada.

Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada.

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada. (corresponding author). ORCID: .

Professor, Institute for Structural Statics and Dynamics, Univ. of Wuppertal, Wuppertal 42285, Germany.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000047010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000470 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.02210.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.022 ↗
4. ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
5. ASTM. 2023. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-23. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
6. Balint, P. S., and H. P. Taylor. 1972. Reinforcement detailing of frame corner joints with particular reference to opening corners. London: Cement and Concrete Association.
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(217)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(217) ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143) ↗
9. El-Sayed, A. K., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2006. “Shear capacity of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI Mater. J. 103 (3): 383.
10. Fukuyama, H., Y. Masuda, Y. Sonobe, and M. Tanigaki. 1995. “Structural performances of concrete frame reinforced with FRP reinforcement.” In Vol. 29. Proc., 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, edited by L. Taerwe. London: CRC Press.
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.09110.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.091 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000060910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000609 ↗
13. 10.1139/l11-06610.1139/l11-066 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11197710.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111977 ↗
15. Johansson, M. 2001. “Reinforcement detailing in concrete frame corners.” Struct. J. 98 (1): 105–115.
16. Kemp, E., and P. Mukherjee. 1968. “Inelastic behaviour of concrete knee joints.” Consulting Eng. 32: 44–48.
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
18. 10.1260/1369-4332.18.9.146110.1260/1369-4332.18.9.1461 ↗
19. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
20. Luo, Y. H., A. J. Durrani, S. Bai, and J. Yuan. 1994. “Study of reinforcing detail of tension bars in frame corner connections.” Struct. J. 91 (4): 486–496.
21. Mayfield, B., F. K. Kong, A. Bennison, and J. C. T. Davies. 1971. “Corner joint details in structural lightweight concrete.” J. Proc. 68 (5): 366–372.
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000110210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001102 ↗
23. Petersson, P. E. (1981). Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials. Rep. No. TVBM-1006. Lund, Sweden: Div. of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund Univ.
24. 10.1023/B:ACMA.0000035480.85721.b510.1023/B:ACMA.0000035480.85721.b5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.14110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.141 ↗
26. Sleiman, N., R. Barrage, G. J. Milligan, and M. A. Polak. 2018. “Testing and finite element analysis of GFRP reinforced concrete frame joints.” ACI Spec. Publ. 327: 26.1–26.18.
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000102910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001029 ↗
28. Stoner, J., and M. A. Polak. 2020. “Finite element modelling of GFRP reinforced concrete beams.” Comput. Concr. 25 (4): 369–382.
29. Swann, R. A. 1969. Flexural strength of corners of reinforced concrete portal frames. Technical Rep. No. TRA/434. London: Cement and Concrete Association.
30. 10.1680/istbu.1993.2250810.1680/istbu.1993.22508 ↗