Behavior and Ductility of Simple and Continuous FRP Reinforced Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
The behaviors of simply and continuously supported beams reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) materials are presented in this paper. The experimental testing program included seven simple rectangular beams and seven continuous T-section beams. Reinforcing bars and stirrups were made of steel, carbon, or glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP). It was concluded that the use of GFRP stirrups increased the shear deformation, and as a result deflection increased. Also, GFRP stirrups changed the failure mode from flexural to shear or flexural-shear, depending on the type of reinforcement bars (FRP or steel). Furthermore, the use of FRP reinforcement in continuous beams increased deformation. This increase remained small and acceptable at the service load level, but significantly increased near failure. While different FRP reinforcement arrangements were found to have the same load capacity as steel reinforcements in conventional beams, failure modes and ductility differed. Failure mode was governed by both the type of reinforcing bars and the type of stirrups. Additionally, the dowel effect influences the load carrying capacity of FRP reinforced continuous beams. A method for evaluating the ductility is presented. The ratio of absorbed energy at failure to the total energy, “energy ratio,” was used as a measure of ductility. Based on this definition, a classification of ductile, semiductile, and brittle behavior is suggested. The theoretical results obtained using the suggested method were substantiated experimentally. The continuous beams experienced higher “energy ratios” than did simple beams.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Lawrence Tech. Univ., Southfield, MI 48075.
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Suez Canal Univ., Port-Said, Egypt.
Prof., Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, Canada N9B-3P4.
PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Lawrence Tech. Univ., Southfield, MI.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Serviceability of concrete beams prestressed by carbon-fiber-reinforced-plastic bars.
2. “Design provisions for fibre reinforced structures in the Canadian highway bridge design code.” (1998). Adv. Compos. Mat. in Bridges and Struct. 2nd Conf. 391–406.
3. Dolan C. W. (1989). “Prestressed concrete using kevlar reinforced tendons ” PhD thesis Cornell Univ. Ithaca N.Y.
4. Faza S. S. (1991). “Bending and bond behavior and design of concrete beams reinforced with FRP rebars ” PhD thesis West Virginia Univ. Morgantown W.Va.
5. Ductility of prestressed concrete bridges using CFRP tendons.
6. Jaeger L. G. Tadros G. and Mufti A. A. (1995). “Balanced section ductility and deformability in concrete with FRP reinforcement.” Res. Rep. Joint U.S.-Can. Meeting at West Virginia Univ. Morgantown W.Va.
7. Jeong S. M. (1994). “Evaluation of ductility in prestressed concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastic tendons ” PhD thesis Univ. of Michigan Ann Arbor Mich.
8. Kakizawa T. Ohno S. and Yonezawa T. (1993). “Flexural behavior and energy absorption of CFRP reinforced concrete beams.” Fiber reinforced plastics reinforcement for concrete structure ACI Int. Symp. SP-138 Am. Concrete Inst. Detroit Mich. Leadline carbon fiber tendons/bars product manual. (1992). Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. Tokyo Japan.
9. Morphy R. Shehata E. and Rizkalla S. (1997). “Bent effect on strength of CFRP stirrups.” Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Nonmetallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Struct. (2) 19–26.
10. Saadatmanesh H. and Ehsani M. R. (1991). “Fiber composite bar for reinforced concrete construction.” J. Compos. Mat. 25(2) 188–203.10.1177/002199839102500204 ↗
11. Tezuka M. Ochiai M. Tottori S. and Sato R. (1995). “Experimental study on moment redistribution of continuous beams reinforced or pretensioned with FRP.” 2nd Int. Symp. Nonmetallic Reinforcement (FRP) for Concrete Struct. 387–394.
12. Tommaso A. and Focacci F. (1996). “Driven failure mechanisms in fiber-reinforced-plastic prestressed concrete beams for ductility requirements.” 2nd Conf. on Adv. Compos. Mat. in Bridges and Struct. 281–288.
13. Vijay P. V. Kumar S. V. and GangRao H. V. S. (1996). “Shear and ductility behavior of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP rebars.” 2nd Conf. on Adv. Compos. Mat. in Bridges and Struct. 217–226.
14. Flexural and shear behavior of beams reinforced with 3D continuous carbon fiber fabric.