Analytical Design Model for Reinforced-Concrete Beams Strengthened in Shear Using L-Shaped CFRP Plates
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an analytical study on reinforced concrete (RC) T-beams strengthened in shear with L-shaped fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates. The main objective of this study is to develop design equations for RC beams retrofitted in shear using L-shaped FRP plates, considering all possible modes of failure in ultimate limit states. Unlike RC beams strengthened with externally bonded (EB) FRP plates and fabrics, prefabricated L-shaped plates feature unconventional failure modes because of their special shape and anchorage. The possible failure modes for RC beams strengthened with L-shaped FRP plates are (1) concrete breakout at the embedded part of the FRP plate in the flange; (2) FRP pull-off at the epoxy/FRP interface; (3) FRP pull-off at the concrete/epoxy interface; and (4) FRP overlap failure at the beam soffit. These failure modes do not occur in RC beams shear-strengthened with EB FRP fabrics and plates. Therefore, the existing design models for EB FRP fabrics and plates cannot predict with sufficient accuracy the contribution of FRP to the shear resistance of RC beams shear-strengthened with L-shaped plates. In this article, new design equations are proposed in light of recent developments and data. These equations distinguish the failure mode and calculate the FRP contribution to the shear resistance of RC beams strengthened with L-shaped FRP plates. In some cases, full embedment of the L-shaped carbon FRP (CFRP) plates in the RC beam flange is not feasible because of the presence of an obstacle (e.g., longitudinal reinforcing steel bars in the flange). The new design equations are applicable to RC beams strengthened with L-shaped FRP plates with different embedment lengths (including no embedment) of the CFRP plates in the RC beam flange. The proposed design equations are validated against experimental data collected from the literature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ., 817 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 0C3.
Professor of Construction Engineering, Univ. of Quebec, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 1K3 (corresponding author).
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Science, McGill Univ., Sherbrooke West, Quebec, Canada H3A 0C3.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Blaschko M. (2003). “Bond behavior of CFRP strips glued into slits.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures K. H. Tan ed. World Scientific Singapore 205–214.10.1142/9789812704863_0017 ↗
2. Brosens K. and Van Gemert D. (1999). “Anchorage design for externally bonded carbon-fiber polymer laminates.” Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures American Concrete Institute Farmington Hills MI 635–645.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000017410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000174 ↗
4. 10.1139/cjce-25-4-69210.1139/cjce-25-4-692 ↗
5. Chen J. and Robertson I. (2004). “Test of cracked pre-stressed concrete T-beam retrofitted for shear using CFRP L-shaped plates.” Univ. of Hawaii Research Rep. UHM/CEE/04-06 Univ. of Hawaii Mānoa HI.
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784) ↗
7. 10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00091-010.1016/S0950-0618(02)00091-0 ↗
8. Behavior and design of single adhesive anchors under tensile load in uncracked concrete
9. Nachträgliche Schubverstärkung mit CFK-Winkeln
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.001 ↗
11. Anchorage length of near-surface mounted fiber-reinforced polymer rods for concrete strengthening—Analytical modeling
12. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with NSM fiber-reinforced polymer rods
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.003 ↗
14. 10.1002/best.20049014210.1002/best.200490142 ↗
15. Behavior and design of adhesive bonded anchors
16. Eidgenössische Materialprüfungs und Forschungsanstalt (EMPA). (2002). “Shear strengthening with prefabricated CFRP L-shaped plates: Test beams S1 to S6.” Test Rep. 116/7 EMPA Dübendorf Switzerland.
17. FIB-TG 9.3. (2001). Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures International Federation for Structural Concrete Lausanne Switzerland.
18. Concrete capacity design (CCD) approach for fastening to concrete
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000006710.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000067 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(195)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(195) ↗
21. Maeda T. Asano Y. Sato Y. Ueda T. and Kakuta Y. (1997). “A study on bond mechanism of carbon fiber sheet.” Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures Vol. 1 Japan Concrete Institute Tokyo Japan 279–286.
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1016)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1016) ↗
23. CFK-Schubverstärkungselemente
24. Meszaros J. (1999). “Tragverhalten von Verbunddübeln im ungerissenen und gerissenen Beton.” Doctoral thesis Univ. of Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany (in German).
25. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000516110.1061/JSDEAG.0005161 ↗
26. 10.1139/l11-01310.1139/l11-013 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000021910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000219 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000029210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000292 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000026310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000263 ↗
30. Mofidi A. Thivierge S. Chaallal O. and Shao Y. (2013). “Performance of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in shear using L-shaped CFRP plates—An experimental investigation” J. Compos. Constr. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000398.JCCOF21090-026810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000398 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.023 ↗
32. Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete
33. Neubauer U. · 1997 · 109
34. Oehlers D. J. · 2004
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.08.014 ↗
36. Robertson I. Johnson G. P. and Sharma B. (2007). “Shear retrofit of concrete T-beams using CFRP.” Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Fiber-Reinforced Polymers in Reinforced Concrete Structures Univ. of Patras Patras Greece.
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401) ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(62)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(62) ↗
39. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using epoxy-bonded FRP composites
40. Improving shear capacity of existing reinforced concrete members by applying carbon fiber sheets
41. Ulaga T. Vogel T. and Meier U. (2003). “Bilinear stress–slip bond model: Theoretical background and significance.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-6) Vol. 1 World Scientific Singapore 153–162.10.1142/9789812704863_0012 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.001 ↗