Structural Reliability of GFRP-RC Slab Column Connections Based on a Data-Driven Robust Algorithm: Punching Shear Limit State
Source abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on the assessment of the structural reliability of the punching shear limit state in five distinct configurations of glass fiber–reinforced polymers (GFRP)–RC slab-column connections, illustrating their diverse applications through a robust data-driven method. The Nelder–Mead simplex minimization algorithm is used to fit an efficient predictive model for the ultimate punching shear capacity. In the context of the reliability analysis, considered variables include the effective depth, GFRP reinforcement area, concrete compressive strength, GFRP modulus, dead loads, live load, and errors in the mechanical model. The data set, forming the basis for the data-driven model, is derived from numerical simulations conducted using an FEM based on a concrete damaged plasticity model, which was first validated with sixteen experimental observations from the literature. Structural reliability is also assessed using the first-order reliability method in accordance with commonly used design provisions for GFRP-reinforced concrete structures in North America. The results indicate that the provisions based on US standards generally lead to reliability indices above 3.0, while those following Canadian standards result in indices below this threshold in a significant proportion (40%) of cases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aswan Univ.
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic Univ.,
Univ. Angers
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI CODE-318.19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
3. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. ACI CODE-440.11-22. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
4. 10.3390/polym1409174310.3390/polym14091743 ↗
5. Ardebili, M. A. H., and F. P. Anaraki. 2018. “Support vector machine-based reliability analysis of concrete dams.” J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 104: 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.016.10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.016 ↗
6. Badra, N., and A. Deifalla. 2022. “Reliability-based evaluation of two-way shear design reinforced concrete slabs with FRP reinforcements.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Civil Structural and Transportation Engineering. Orléans, ON: Avestia Publishing.
7. 10.1139/l02-08710.1139/l02-087 ↗
8. Bartlett, M., and J. G. MacGregor. 1996. “Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of concrete in structures.” ACI Mater. J. 93 (2): 158–168.
9. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.00810.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.008 ↗
10. Berveiller M. 2005. “Eléments finis stochastiques: Approches intrusive et non intrusive pour des analyses de fiabilité.” Ph.D. thesis Laboratoire de Mécanique et Ingénieries Universit´e BLAISE PASCAL-Clermont II.
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.02210.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.022 ↗
12. BSI (British Standards Institution). 1997. Structural use of concrete: Part 1—Code of practice for design and construction. BS8110. London: BSI.
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.04710.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.047 ↗
14. Chang, K.-H. 2012. “Stochastic Nelder–Mead simplex method—A new globally convergent direct search method for simulation optimization.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220: 684–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.028.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.21410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.214 ↗
16. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CAN/CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
17. 10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00085-310.1016/S0045-7949(03)00085-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.10200510.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.02710.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.027 ↗
21. fib (Federation International du Beton). 2001. Punching of structural concrete slabs. fib Bulletin 12. Lausanne Switzerland: fib.
22. 10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00024-910.1016/S0167-4730(03)00024-9 ↗
23. 10.1139/cjce-2012-017710.1139/cjce-2012-0177 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000042410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000424 ↗
25. JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). 2001. Probabilistic model code. Lausanne Switzerland: JCSS.
26. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 1997. “Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fibre reinforcing materials.” In Concrete engineering. edited by A. Machida. Tokyo, Japan: JSCE.
27. Kariyawasam S. N. 1996. “Developments of probability based resistance factor and companion-action load factors for concrete design in Canada.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Alberta.
28. Khatibinia, M., M. J. Fadaee, J. Salajegheh, and E. Salajegheh. 2015. “Seismic reliability assessment of RC structures including soil–structure interaction using wavelet weighted least squares support vector machine.” J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 110: 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.006.10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.006 ↗
29. 10.1002/978047061170810.1002/9780470611708 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10401310.1016/j.jobe.2022.104013 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.03510.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.035 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10230010.1016/j.jobe.2021.102300 ↗
33. MathWorks. 2022. MATLAB version: 9.13.0 (R2022b). Natick, MA: MathWorks.
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(154)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(154) ↗
35. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.05110.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.051 ↗
36. NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2015. Canadian commission on building and fire codes. Part 4. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
37. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.30810.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000032410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000324 ↗
39. Ospina, C. E., S. D. B. Alexander, and J. J. Roger-Cheng. 2003. “Punching of two-way concrete slabs with fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars or grids.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (5): 589–598.
40. 10.1016/j.apm.2008.12.00110.1016/j.apm.2008.12.001 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(154)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(154) ↗
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1037)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1037) ↗
43. Ruiz, M. F., Y. Mirzaei, and A. Muttoni. 2013. “Post-punching behavior of flat slabs.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (5): 801–811.
44. Sgrensen, J. D., I. B. Kroon, and M. H. Faber. 1994. “Optimal reliability-based code calibration.” J. Struct. Saf. 15: 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90040-X.10.1016/0167-4730(94)90040-X ↗
45. 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00043-610.1016/S0951-8320(01)00043-6 ↗
46. Sudret, B., M. Berveiller, and M. Lemaire. 2004. “Eléments finis stochastiques en élasticité linéaire.” C.R. Mec. 332: 332–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2004.02.024.10.1016/j.crme.2004.02.024 ↗
47. Szerszen, M. M., and A. S. Nowak. 2003. “Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): Part 2—Reliability analysis and resistance factors.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (3): 383–391.
48. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10674410.1016/j.tws.2020.106744 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0167-4730(96)00025-210.1016/S0167-4730(96)00025-2 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00197-110.1016/S0141-0296(97)00197-1 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00018-710.1016/S0167-4730(00)00018-7 ↗
52. Xu, S., Y. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2019. “Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder-Mead simplex method.” J. Energy 173: 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.106.10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.106 ↗
53. 10.1002/asl.12510.1002/asl.125 ↗
54. Zic, M., and S. Pereverzyev. 2019. “Optimizing noisy CNLS problems by using Nelder-Mead algorithm: A new method to compute simplex step efficiency.” J. Electroanal. Chem. 851: 113439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113439.10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113439 ↗