Out-of-Plane Flexural Performance of GFRP-Reinforced Masonry Walls
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to assess the out-of-plane flexural performance of masonry walls that are reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRPs) rods, as an alternative for steel rebars. Eight 1 m×3 m full-scale walls were constructed using hollow concrete masonry units and tested in four-point bending with an effective span of 2.4 m between the supports. The walls were tested when subjected to increasing monotonic loads up to failure. The applied loads would represent out-of-plane loads arising from wind, soil pressure, or inertia force during earthquakes. One wall is unreinforced; another wall is reinforced with customary steel rebars; and the other six walls are reinforced with different amounts of GFRP reinforcement. Two of the GFRP-reinforced walls were grouted only in the cells where the rods were placed to investigate the effect of grouting the empty cells. The force-deformation relationship of the walls and the associated strains in the reinforcement were monitored throughout the tests. The relative performance of different walls is assessed to quantify the effect of different design variables. The range of GFRP reinforcement ratios covered in the experiments was used to propose a capacity diagram for the design of FRP-reinforced masonry walls similar to that of reinforced concrete elements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montréal PQ, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author).
M.A.Sc. Graduate Student, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montréal PQ, Canada H3G 1M8.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete masonry walls under out-of-plane monotonic loads
2. Ahmed E. A. El-Salakawy E. and Benmokrane B. (2006). “Behaviour of post-installed GFRP adhesive anchors in concrete.” Technical Rep. Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Québec.
3. ASTM. (2002a). “Standard specification for grout for masonry.” C476-02 West Conshohocken Pa.
4. ASTM. (2002b). “Standard specification for mortar for unit masonry.” C270-02 West Conshohocken Pa.
5. ASTM. (2002c). “Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms.” C1314-02 West Conshohocken Pa.
6. ASTM. (2002d). “Standard test method for flexural bond strength of masonry.” E518-02 West Conshohocken Pa.
7. ASTM. (2002e). “Standard test method for preconstruction and construction evaluation of mortars for plain and reinforced unit masonry.” C780-02 West Conshohocken Pa.
8. Bentz E. C. (2000). “Sectional analysis of reinforced concrete members.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Toronto Toronto.
9. Brown V. L. and Bartholomew C. L. (1996). “Long-term deflections of GFRP-reinforced concrete beams.” Proc. ICCI Tuscon Ariz. 389–400.
10. The Canadian Network of Centres of Excellence on Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures (ISIS Canada). (2001). “Design manual No. 3: Reinforcing concrete structures with fiber reinforced polymers.” Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
11. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004a). “Design of masonry structures.” S304.1-04 Mississauga Ont. Canada.
12. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004b). “Mortar and grout for unit masonry.” A179-04 Mississauga Ont. Canada.
13. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” CHBDC S6-06 Toronto Ont. Canada.
14. Strength and deformation of confined and unconfined grouted concrete masonry
15. Drysdale R. G. · 2005
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.047 ↗
17. Gao D. Benmokrane B. and Masmoudi R. (1998). “A calculating method of flexural properties of FRP-reinforced concrete beam. Part 1: Crack width and deflection.” Technical Rep. Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Québec Canada.
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(298)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(298) ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00007-410.1016/S0266-3538(98)00007-4 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(186)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(186) ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(139)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(139) ↗
22. Deflection of reinforced masonry members
23. Jaeger G. L. Tadros G. and Mufti A. A. (1995). “Balanced section ductility and deformability in concrete with FRP reinforcement.” Research Rep. No. 2 Industry Center for Computer-Aided Engineering Technical Univ. of Nova Scotia Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
24. Jeong S. M. (1994). “Evaluation of ductility in prestressed concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastic tendons.” Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Michigan Ann Arbor Mich.
25. 10.1177/002199830203600947510.1177/0021998302036009475 ↗
26. Mierzejewski W. Fam A. MacDougall C. and Chidiac S. E. (2008). “Out-of-plane testing of masonry walls with near-surface mounted (NSM) reinforcement.” 2nd Canadian Conf. on Effective Design of Structures McMaster Univ. Hamilton Ont. Canada.
27. Stress-strain curves for unconfined and confined concrete masonry
28. Pultrall. (2007). “V-ROD fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars: Product guide specifications.” Pultrall Inc. Thetford Mines Québec Canada.
29. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00045-410.1016/S0263-8223(02)00045-4 ↗
30. Silva P. · 2001
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(79)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(79) ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:1(7)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:1(7) ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.04210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.042 ↗