journal article·2005-12Open access

In-Plane Seismic Response of URM Walls Upgraded with FRP

Mohamed A. ElGawady, Pierino Lestuzzi, Marc Badoux

Abstract

Recent earthquakes have shown the vulnerability of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, which have led to an increasing demand for techniques to upgrade URM buildings. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) can provide an upgrading alternative for URM buildings. This paper presents results of dynamic tests investigating the in-plane behavior of URM walls upgraded with FRP (URM-FRP). These tests represent pioneer work in this area (dynamic and in-plane). Five half-scale walls were built, using half-scale brick clay units, and upgraded on one face only. Two moment/shear ratios (1.4 and 0.7), two mortar types (M2.5 and M9), three composite materials (carbon, aramid, and glass), three fiber structures (plates, loose fabric, and grids), and two upgrading configurations (diagonal “X” and full surface shapes) were investigated. The test specimens were subjected to a series of synthetic earthquake motions with increasing intensities on a uniaxial earthquake simulator. The tests validate the effectiveness of the one side upgrading: the upgrading technique improved the lateral resistance of the URM walls by a factor ranging from 1.3 to 2.9; however, the improvement in the lateral drift was less significant. Moreover, no uneven response was observed during the test due to the single side upgrading. Regarding the upgrading configurations, the bidirectional surface type materials (fabrics and grids) applied on the entire surface of the wall (and correctly anchored) can help postpone the three classic failure modes of masonry walls: rocking (“flexural failure”), step cracking, and sliding (“shear failures”). Additionally, in some situations, they will postpone collapse by “keeping the bricks together” under large seismic deformations. On the other hand, the diagonal “X” shape was less successful and premature failure was developed during the test.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Univ. of Auckland, Private bag 92019, New Zealand; formerly, PhD Candidate, Applied Computing and Mechanics Laboratory (IS-IMAC), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland (corresponding author).

Lecturer, IS-IMAC-ENAC-EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

IS-BETON-ENAC-EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; formerly, Professor.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Abrams D. P. and Lynch J. M. (2001). “Flexural behavior of retrofitted masonry piers.” Proc. KEERC-MAE Joint Seminar on Risk Mitigation for Regions of Moderate Seismicity Ill.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(76)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(76) ↗
3. Comite Euro-International du Béton (CEN). (1994). “Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures.” Eurocode 8 Lausanne Switzerland.
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(134)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(134) ↗
5. ElGawady M. A. Lestuzzi P. and Badoux M. (2004). “A review of retrofitting of unreinforced masonry walls using composites.” Proc. 4th International Conf. on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures CSCE Calgary Alberta Canada.
6. ElGawady M. A. Lestuzzi P. and Badoux M. (2003). “Dynamic tests on URM walls before and after upgrading with composites.” Experimental Rep. Publication No. 1 IMAC ENAC EPFL Switzerland.
7. 10.1193/1.146137610.1193/1.1461376 ↗
8. Lestuzzi P. Wenk T. and Bachmann H. (1999). “Dynamic tests of RC structural walls on the ETH earthquake simulator.” Rep. No. 240 Dept. of Civil Environmental and Geomatics Engineering Institute of Structural Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich Switzerland.
9. Schwegler G. (1994). “Masonry construction strengthened with fiber composites in seismically endangered zones.” Proc. 10th ECEE Vienna Austria 2299–2303.