Interlocking fiber features for mixed-mode crack arrest in weakly bonded CFRP joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Adhesive joints in carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) structures may contain weak bonds that are difficult to detect and can trigger mixed-mode crack propagation, leading to the use of redundant mechanical fasteners. To realize boltless aircraft adhesive structures, this study investigates crack arresters based on interlocking fiber features for suppressing mixed-mode crack propagation in weakly bonded joints. After establishing a reproducible weak bond preparation method, three interlocking fiber features were examined: Straight Interlocking Fiber Feature (SIFF), Mechanically Hooked Interlocking Fiber Feature (MHIFF), and Diagonally Interlocking Fiber Feature (DIFF). Crack lap shear static and fatigue tests were conducted to evaluate crack arresting performance. All interlocking fiber features arrested interfacial debonding at the fiber cross-link and enhanced static strength, with DIFF achieving the highest strength, up to 2.6 times that of a normally bonded joint without crack arresters. In fatigue tests, SIFF did not suppress mixed-mode crack propagation, whereas MHIFF and DIFF suppressed fatigue crack growth beyond the fiber cross-link up to 100,000 cycles. Among the three interlocking fiber features, DIFF exhibited the most favorable balance of mixed-mode fatigue crack suppression and structural simplicity, indicating high potential for practical applications. (188 words)
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Blohowiak KY Dilligan MA Grace WB et al. Qualified bonded systems approach to certified bonded structure. NATO STO. 2018.
2. Austin Weber. Assembly automation takes off in aerospace industry [internet]. ASSEMBLY. 2015. Available from: https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/92790-assembly-automation-takes-off-in-aerospace-industry
3. 10.3390/aerospace1002013710.3390/aerospace10020137 ↗
4. 10.1080/00218464.2012.66004210.1080/00218464.2012.660042 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10798010.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107980 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.04110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.041 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10589210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105892 ↗
9. Storage K Helbach A Piehl M et al. Validation of laser bond inspection technology. ICCM22. 2019.
10. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10267510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102675 ↗
11. 10.1080/00218464.2022.208828210.1080/00218464.2022.2088282 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10918210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109182 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10796710.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107967 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.020 ↗
16. Minakuchi S. Fiber-reinforcement-based crack arrester for composite bonded joints. ICCM20. Copenhagen Denmark; 2015.
17. Minakuchi S. Nobuo Takeda. Arresting crack in composite bonded joint using fiber-reinforcement-based design feature. ECCM17. Munich Germany; 2016.
18. Hisada S, Minakuchi S, Takeda N. Interlocking fiber configuration effect on mode-I disbond arresting in composite bonded joints. Sampe J. 2020;56(5):6-15.
19. Minakuchi S, Takeda N. Arresting fatigue crack in composite bonded joint using fiber-reinforcement design feature. Nagoya, Japan: ICAF29; 2017.
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.033 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10809010.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108090 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10695410.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106954 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11284310.1016/j.matdes.2024.112843 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10857510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108575 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.02510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.025 ↗
27. 10.1080/00218464.2018.155504110.1080/00218464.2018.1555041 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10834610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108346 ↗
29. Bossi RH, Piehl MJ, Frisch DA, et al. Methods for fabricating fiber-reinforced plastic test specimen assemblies having weak adhesive bonds. Chicago; 2013.
30. Wood M, Charlton P, Yan D. Ultrasonic evaluation of artificial kissing bonds in CFRP composites. J Nondestr Test. 2014;19(12):1-10.
31. ASTM International. Astm d3163-01 standard test method for determining strength of adhesively bonded rigid plastic lap-shear joints in shear by tension loading. West Conshohocken; 2023.
32. 10.6089/jscm.46.12110.6089/jscm.46.121 ↗
33. ASTM International. ASTM E647-23a standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. West Conshohocken; 2023.