FRP-Confined Clay Brick Masonry Assemblages under Axial Compression: Experimental and Analytical Investigations
Source abstract
Abstract
Unreinforced masonry (URM) structures that are in need of repair and rehabilitation constitute a significant portion of building stock worldwide. The successful application of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) for repair and retrofitting of reinforced-concrete (RC) structures has opened new avenues for strengthening URM structures with FRP materials. The present study analyzes the behavior of FRP-confined masonry prisms under monotonic axial compression. Masonry comprising of burnt clay bricks and cement—sand mortar (generally adopted in the Indian subcontinent) having Eb/Em ratio less than one is employed in the study. The parameters considered in the study are, (1) masonry bonding pattern, (2) inclination of loading axis to the bed joint, (3) type of FRP (carbon FRP or glass FRP), and (4) grade of FRP fabric. The performance of FRP-confined masonry prisms is compared with unconfined masonry prisms in terms of compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and stress-strain response. The results showed an enhancement in compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, strain at peak stress, and ultimate strain for FRP-confined masonry prisms. The FRP confinement of masonry resulted in reducing the influence of the inclination of the loading axis to the bed joint on the compressive strength and failure pattern. Various analytical models available in the literature for the prediction of compressive strength of FRP-confined masonry are assessed. New coefficients are generated for the analytical model by appending experimental results of the current study with data available in the literature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Principal Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India (corresponding author).
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(650)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(650) ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(148)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(148) ↗
3. ASTM. (2000). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039/D3039M West Conshohocken PA.
4. ASTM. (2009). “Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile.” C67-09 West Conshohocken PA.
5. Atul India. (2014). 〈http://www.atul.co.in/〉.
6. British Standards Institution (BSI). (1980). “British standard methods of testing mortars screeds and plasters.” 4551 London U.K.
7. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). (2002). “Code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry.” 1905–1987 New Delhi India.
8. 10.1002/047085518510.1002/0470855185 ↗
9. Consiglo Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR). (2004). “Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures.” CNR-DT 200/2004 Italian National Research Council Rome.
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000011310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000113 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177) ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(73) ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:2(128)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:2(128) ↗
16. Lam L. and Teng J. G. (2001). “A new stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete.” Proc. Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering Elsevier New York 283–292.
17. 10.3390/polym604118710.3390/polym6041187 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827) ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
20. MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick MA MathWorks.
21. Nigro E. Paciello S. and Faella C. (2004). “Sperimentazione sul confinamento con FRP di pilastrini in muratura di pietra naturale ed artificiale [experimental study on FRP-confined masonry columns made of natural and artificial stone].” Proc. 12th National Congress ANIDIS The Seismic Engineering in Italy ANIDIS Rome.
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.11.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.11.005 ↗
23. Stress-strain characteristics of concrete columns externally confined with advanced fiber composite sheets
24. FRP composites for masonry retrofitting
25. 10.1617/s11527-008-9358-x10.1617/s11527-008-9358-x ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.020 ↗