Timber Beams Strengthened with GFRP Bars: Development and Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Repair and rehabilitation of infrastructure is becoming increasingly important for bridges due to material deterioration and limited capacity to accommodate current load levels. An experimental program was undertaken to study the flexural behavior of creosote-treated sawn Douglas fir timber beams strengthened with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Twenty-two half-scale and four full-scale timber beams strengthened with GFRP were tested to failure. The percent reinforcement ratios were between 0.27 and 0.82%. Additional unreinforced timber beams were tested as control specimens. The results have shown that using the proposed experimental technique changed the failure mode from brittle tension to compression failure, and flexural strength increased by 18 to 46%. Research findings indicate the use of near-surface GFRP bars overcomes the effect of local defects in the timber and enhances the bending strength of the members. Based on the experimental results, an analytical model is proposed to predict the flexural capacity of both unreinforced and GFRP-reinforced timber beams. The article also reviews implementation of the proposed technique for strengthening a timber bridge near Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Wood Treatment and Properties · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 5V6, Canada.
Assist. Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 5V6, Canada.
Distinguished Professor of Civil Engineering and Construction, CFL, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges . Washington D.C.
2. ASTM. (1992). “Standard methods for static tests of timber in structural sizes.” ASTM D198-92 Philadelphia Pa.
3. Bakoss S. L. Greenland A. and Crews K. I. (1999). “Bridge deck and industrial heavy-duty flooring system based on laminated veneer lumber beams reinforced with carbon fiber composites.” Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Struct. Faults and Repair London.
4. Barrett J. D. and Lau W. (1994). Canadian lumber properties E. D. Jones ed. Canadian Wood Council Ottawa.
5. Bazan I. M. M. (1980). “Ultimate bending strength of timber beams.”PhD thesis Nova Scotia Technical College Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
6. Prestressed wood members.
7. Bohannan B. (1996). “Effect of member size on bending strength of wood members.” Forest Serv. Res. Paper FPL 56 U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington D.C.
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1213)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1213) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:2(433)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:2(433) ↗
10. Chajes M. J. Kaliakin V. N. and Meyer A. J. (1996). “Behavior of engineered wood-CFRP beams.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Comp. in Infrastr. H. Saadatmanesh and M. R. Ehsani eds. Univ. of Arizona Tucson Ariz. 870–877.
11. 10.1520/CTR10544J10.1520/CTR10544J ↗
12. 10.1520/CTR10545J10.1520/CTR10545J ↗
13. Dorey A. B. and Cheng J. J. R. (1996). “The behavior of GFRP glued laminated timber beams.” Proc. Adv. Comp. Mat. in Bridges and Struct. II M. M. El-Badry ed. The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Montreal Canada 787–794.
14. Hernandez R. Davalos J. F. Sonti S. S. Kim Y. and Moody R. C. (1997). “Strength and stiffness of reinforced yellow-poplar glued laminated beams.” Res. Pap. FPL-RP-554 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison Wisc.
15. Johns K. C. and Lacroix S. (2000). “Composite reinforcement of timber in bending.” Can. J. of Civil Engrg. 27 899–906.10.1139/l00-017 ↗
16. The flexural behavior of steel reinforced laminated timber beams.
17. 10.1139/l86-03010.1139/l86-030 ↗
18. Wood-aluminum beams within and beyond the elastic range.
19. Wood beams prestressed with bonded tension elements.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:3(300)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:3(300) ↗
21. Reinforced wood laminated beams.
22. Sonti S. S. GangaRao H. V. S. and Superfesky M. C. (1996). “Rehabilitation and strengthening of glulam stringers for bridge superstructures.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Comp. in Infrastr. H. Saadatmanesh and M. R. Ehsani eds. University of Arizona Tucson Ariz. 800–813.
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1270)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1270) ↗
24. Weibull W. (1939). “A statistical theory of the strength of materials.” Proc. No. 151 Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research Stockholm.