Statistical safety evaluation method for composite high-pressure hydrogen vessels considering stacking sequence effect and fiber strength development rate
Source abstract
Abstract
We developed a method to evaluate the failure rate (FR) for the cylindrical part of a composite high-pressure hydrogen vessel with arbitrary dimensions, number of layers, and stacking sequences by giving the mean and standard deviation of the fiber strength development rate and the stiffness reduction rate under various damage types. The FR is the rate at which the residual strength of a vessel is below the maximum service pressure (125%NWP). Assuming a case in which the vessel is designed with the damage-tolerance design, the FR was calculated for the case of all-layer matrix cracking (assuming beginning-of-life) and fiber failure in two layers in addition to the matrix cracking (assuming the most severe damage that is tolerable during service). The observations demonstrate the importance of improving the probability of detection for non-destructive testing in ensuring the safety of damage-tolerance-designed vessels after fiber failure. The mean strength of the fibers mainly affected the mean residual strength of the composite high-pressure hydrogen vessels when the dimensions and stacking sequence remained unchanged.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Yokohama National University
Funding
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.073 ↗
2. Rahul B, Chand DS, Dharani J. A comprehensive review on the performance analysis of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2022;49(2):272–287.
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.09010.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.090 ↗
4. Uchida Y. High-pressure hydrogen tanks to support fuel cell vehicles. Toyoda Gosei Tech J. 2014 (In Japanese);56:49–52.
5. United Nations. Global technical regulation No. 13 global technical regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles. (NY): United Nations; 2013.
6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11119-3: 2020 (E) gas cylinders – design construction and testing of refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes part 3: fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners or without liners. Geneva: ISO; 2020.
7. 10.1080/09243046.2024.231331210.1080/09243046.2024.2313312 ↗
8. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Composite aircraft structure Advisory Circular AC No: 20-107B. Change 2010.
9. Tomioka J, Masuda S, Tamura H et al. Influence of hydraulic sequential tests on the burst strength of type-4 compressed hydrogen containers. ID, International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 159, Adelaide, Australia; 2019.
10. Bertin M, Villalonga S, Vernede M, et al. Mechanical behavior of 700bar type IV high pressure vessel: comparison between simulations and experiments through osirhys IV project. In: Proc. of 15th European Conference on Composite Materials; Venice, Italy; 2012.
11. 10.1007/978-3-319-49710-510.1007/978-3-319-49710-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.06810.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.068 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.18510.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.185 ↗
14. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. ADR/RID technical annexes to the European agreements concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods. (NY): United Nations; 2017.
15. International Maritime Organization. International maritime code for dangerous goods (IMDG code). IMO p. 544. London Annex 5 2016.
16. 10.1080/09243046.2024.231331210.1080/09243046.2024.2313312 ↗
17. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00424.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00424.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11191510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111915 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11304610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113046 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.04310.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.043 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.068 ↗
22. 10.2472/jsms.47.71910.2472/jsms.47.719 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00454-110.1016/S0921-5093(97)00454-1 ↗
24. Cruse TA. Reliability-based mechanical design. 1st ed. (NY): Marcel Dekker; 1997.