Bonded FRP Plates for Strengthening Rectangular Hollow Steel Section T-Joints against Web Buckling Induced by Transverse Compression
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper addresses the strengthening of T-joints of rectangular hollow steel section (HSS) chords against web buckling induced by transverse compression loading of welded brace members. Twelve T-joints of 1,200 mm long, 203×76×3.09 (or 5.92) mm HSS chords, welded to 400 mm long, 76×76×8.9 mm, HSS braces were tested under brace axial compression. Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) plates, 9.4 mm thick, of different configurations, with and without edge tapering, and 2 mm thick high-modulus carbon-FRP plates of equivalent stiffness, were adhesively bonded to the webs of the chord near the brace. Strength gain increases significantly, from 9–38%, as the web height-to-thickness (h/t) ratio of the HSS chord increases from 34 to 65. In thin-walled HSS (h/t=65), retrofitting provided significant gains in strength but not in ductility. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates delayed and shifted local buckling away from brace location but did not prevent it. Square-edged and tapered plates behaved similarly. Plates as small as half the chord depth and of width equal to the brace provided a 35% strength gain. Very wide plates, 0.4 of the span, provided a 53% gain. In thick-walled HSS (h/t=34), retrofitting provided little strength gain but enhanced ductility, especially with properly bonded plates extending on the brace. Generally, plates fractured under local bending or delaminated within plate layers while the bond was fully intact.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Master’s Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Innovative and Retrofitted Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author).
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Aguilera J. Shaat A. and Fam A. (2012). “Strengthening T-Joints of rectangular hollow steel sections against web buckling under brace axial compression using through-wall bolts.” Thin-Walled Struct. 56 71–78.10.1016/j.tws.2012.03.013 ↗
2. ASTM. (2009a). “Standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes.” A500 West Conshohocken PA.
3. ASTM. (2009b). “Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials” E8/E8M-09 West Conshohocken PA.
4. ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039/D3039M West Conshohocken PA.
5. Choo Y. S. Li B. H. Liew J. Y. R. van der Vegte G. J. and Zettlemoyer N. (1998). “Static strength of T-joints reinforced with doubler or collar plates.” 8th Int. Symp. on Tubular Structures A.A. Balkema Balkema Rotterdam.
6. Creative Pultrusion Inc. (2006). “Pultex fiber reinforced polymer flat sheets metric version.” Alum Bank PA 〈http://www.creativepultrusions.com/LitLibrary/properties/metflatsheet.pdf〉.
7. 10.3141/2131-1210.3141/2131-12 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.014 ↗
9. Harries K. and El-Tawil S. (2008). “Steel-FRP composite structural systems.” Proc. 2008 ASCE Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete Conf. VI 703–716.
10. 10.1002/pse.11210.1002/pse.112 ↗
11. IPS Structural Adhesives Inc. (2012). “Technical data sheet SS600 series METHACRYLATE ADHESIVES.” IPS Structural Adhesives Inc. Durham NC 〈http://www.ipscorp.com/structural/construction/ss600_const〉.
12. Kato B. and Nishiyama I. (1979). “The static strength of R.R. joints with large beta ratio.” CIDECT program 5Y Rep. Dept. of Architecture Faculty of Engineering Univ. of Tokyo Japan.
13. Lalani M. (1992). “Developments in tubular joints technology for offshore structures.” Proc. 2nd Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. Int. Soc. Offshore and Polar Engineers Golden CO.
14. Lu L. H. de Winkel G. D. Yu Y. and Wardenier J. (1994). “Deformation limit for the ultimate strength of hollow section joints.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Tubular Structures Melbourne. Balkema Rotterdam 341–348.10.1201/9780203735015-50 ↗
15. 10.1016/0951-8339(96)00007-X10.1016/0951-8339(96)00007-X ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:4(304)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:4(304) ↗
17. 10.3141/1892-2510.3141/1892-25 ↗
18. 10.1139/L05-04210.1139/L05-042 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:6(650)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:6(650) ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:1(2)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:1(2) ↗
21. Shaat A. Schnerch D. Fam A. and Rizkalla S. (2004). “Retrofit of steel structures using fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP): State-of-the-art.” (CD-ROM) 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Washington DC (04-4063).
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:4(311)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:4(311) ↗
23. United Kingdom Dept. of Energy Offshore Technology Report. (1990). “Background to new static strength guidance for tubular joints in steel offshore structures.” OTH 89308 DoN UK.
24. Xia S. H. and Teng J. G. (2005). “Behaviour of FRP-to-steel bonded joints.” Proc. Int. Symp. on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures (BBFS 2005) Int. Institute for FRP in Construction Winnipeg MB Canada 419–426.
25. 10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00023-310.1016/S0263-8231(99)00023-3 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00063-210.1016/S0143-974X(99)00063-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.02.00810.1016/j.engstruct.2006.02.008 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:8(2258)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:8(2258) ↗
29. 10.1680/stbu.2010.163.6.36110.1680/stbu.2010.163.6.361 ↗