journal article·2007-10

Assessment of Load Transfer and Load Distribution in Bridges Utilizing FRP Panels

Danielle D. Kleinhans, John J. Myers, Antonio Nanni

Publisher page

Abstract

A primary means of demonstrating the feasibility and effectiveness of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite bridge materials is via in situ bridge load testing. For this study, the prescribed or assumed design factors for each of the study bridges were compared to those exhibited by the performance of the bridge. Specifically, the wheel load distribution factors and impact factors as defined by AASHTO were considered in order to assess the load transfer and distribution in structures utilizing FRP panels. The in situ testing configurations for the study bridges are outlined, including the truck and instrumentation placement to obtain the desired information. Furthermore, comparisons were drawn between the design values for deflection and those experienced by the structures during testing. It was found that although the deflections exhibited by the bridges were well within the design limits, further research is needed to be able to prescribe bridge design factors for FRP panels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Project Manager, CTLGroup, 5400 Old Orchard Rd., Skokie, IL 60077. E-mail: dkleinhans@ctlgroup.com

Associate Professor of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies, 325 Butler-Carlton CE Hall, Rolla, MO 65409. E-mail: jmyers@umr.edu

Dept. Chair and Professor of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, McArthur Engineering Building, Rm. 325, Coral Gables, FL 33146. E-mail: nanni@miami.edu

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 1996
2. AASHTO · 1998
3. AASHTO · 2000
4. Chajes M. J. Shenton III H. W. and Finch Jr. W. W. (2001). “Performance of a GFRP deck on steel girder bridge.” Proc. Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) Transportation Research Board Washington D.C.
5. Kleinhans D. D. Prota A. and Nanni A. (2003). “Deflection Control for the Future (SP-210).” Deflection assessment of an FRP-reinforced concrete bridge American Concrete Institute Detroit 225–246.
6. Market Development Alliance of the FRP Composites Industry. (2005). “Global FRP use for bridge applications: Vehicular bridges.” ⟨http://www.mdacomposites.org/mda/Bridge-Report-VEH.htm⟩ (June 11 2005).
7. Reising R. (2001). “Performance of a five-span steel bridge with fiber reinforced polymer composite deck panels.” Proc. Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) Transportation Research Board Washington D.C.10.3141/1770-15 ↗
8. Stone D. Koenigsfeld D. Myers J. and Nanni A. (2002a). “Durability of GRFP rods laminates and sandwich panels subjected to various environmental conditions.” 2nd Int. Conf. on Durability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction 213–224.
9. Stone D. Nanni A. and Myers J. (2001a). “Field and laboratory performance of FRP bridge panels.” Proc. Composites in Construction Int. Conf. J. Figueiras L. Juvandes and R. Faria eds. 701–706.
10. Stone D. Prota A. and Nanni A. (2002b). “Performance evaluation of an FRP-reinforced concrete bridge.” Proc. 81st Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) Transportation Research Board Washington D.C.
11. Stone D. Watkins S. Nystrom H. and Nanni A. (2001b). “Investigation of FRP materials for bridge construction.” Proc. 5th National Workshop on Bridge Research in Progress C. K. Shield and A. E. Schultz eds. Univ. of Minnesota Twin Cities Minneapolis 145–150.
12. Stone D. K. (2002). “Investigation of FRP materials for bridge construction.” Ph.D. dissertation Univ. of Missouri Rolla Mo.