journal article·2011-08

Durability of GFRP Rebars in Simulated Concrete Solutions under Accelerated Aging Conditions

A. S. M. Kamal, M. Boulfiza

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper discusses the potential ingress and effects of simulated concrete pore solution species on glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars. Knowing that diffusion of moisture into the fiber-matrix interphase in a composite could cause fiber-matrix debonding and that the presence of alkalis at the location of the glass surface would lead to fiber degradation, particular attention was devoted to investigating whether GFRP rebars allow both species to penetrate or allow only water, while blocking the alkalis. To investigate this scenario, GFRP rebars were immersed in five types of simulated concrete pore solutions at elevated temperatures. Penetration of alkalis was assessed using X-ray mapping of backscattered electron images (BEI) and crosschecked by line and point energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. The effects of diffusion at the fiber-matrix interphase were observed by investigating the degradation of constituents at the interphase. Degradation of polymer matrix was assessed by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Degradation of fiber was investigated by observing highly magnified scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and point EDS analyses close to the interphase. Debonding of fibers from the matrix was investigated using a SEM technique. Fiber-matrix debonding took place in a few samples, despite the fact that the glass fibers and polymer matrix remained essentially intact and that no penetration of alkalis into the GFRP rebars was observed. This debonding, which occurred only for samples exposed to 75°C, is believed to be caused by hydrolysis of fiber sizing at high temperatures. Finally, this study shows that the vinyl ester (VE) polymer matrix used acts as an effective semipermeable membrane by allowing the penetration of water, while blocking alkali ions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Div. of Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Div. of Environmental Engineering and Civil and Geological Engineering, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada (corresponding author).

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0010-4361(83)90160-X10.1016/0010-4361(83)90160-X ↗
2. ASTM. (2007). “Standard guide for preparation of metallographic specimens.” ASTM Standard E3-01 West Conshohocken PA. 〈http://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/E3-01R07.htm〉 (Jul. 5 2011).
3. 10.1177/07316844950140060210.1177/073168449501400602 ↗
4. The effect of material degradation of bond properties of FRP reinforcing bars in concrete
5. Barkatt A. · 2001 · 419
6. Benmokrane B. and Cousin P. (2005). “University of Sherbrooke GFRP durability study report.” Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures (ISIS) Winnipeg MB Canada.
7. Benmokrane B. · 2006
8. Bird R. B. · 2007
9. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). “Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.” CSA-S6-06 Rexdale ON Canada.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:4(279)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:4(279) ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.015 ↗
12. 10.1520/CTR10120J10.1520/CTR10120J ↗
13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.1053810.1002/pc.10538 ↗
15. Chong K. P. (1998). “Durability of composite materials and structures.” Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer for Construction (CDCC’98) B. Benmodrane and H. Rahman eds. Dept. of Civil Engineering Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke PQ Canada 1–12.
16. Dejke V. and Tepfers R. (2001). “Durability and service life prediction of GFRP for concrete reinforcement.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Fiber-Reinforced Plastics for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-5) Vol. 1 Thomas Telford London 505–516.
17. Devalapura R. K. Greenwod M. E. Gauchel J. V. and Humphrey H. (1998). “Evaluation of GFRP performance using accelerated test methods.” Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer for Construction (CDCC’98) B. Benmodrane and H. Rahman eds. Dept. of Civil Engineering Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke PQ Canada 107–116.
18. Flegler S. L. · 1993
19. GangaRao H. V. S. and Vijay P. V. (1997). “Aging of structural composites under varying environmental conditions.” Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-3) Japan Concrete Institute Sapporo Japan 91–98.
20. Goldstein J. (2003). Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis 3rd Ed. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York.
21. Greenwood M. (2002). “Creep-rupture testing to predict long-term performance on durability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for construction.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer for Construction (CDCC’02) B. Benmokrane and E. El-Salakawy eds. Dept. of Civil Engineering Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke PQ Canada 203–212.
22. 10.1023/A:102115331578010.1023/A:1021153315780 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(238)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(238) ↗
24. Katsuki F. and Uomoto T. (1995). “Prediction of deterioration of FRP rods due to alkali attack in nonmetallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures.” Proc. 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. (FRPRCS-2) L. Taerwe ed. RILEM Bagneux France 82–89.
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.03.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.03.005 ↗
26. Koch G. H. Brongers M. P. H. Thomson N. G. Virmanio Y. P. and Payer J. H. (2005). “Cost of corrosion in the United States.” Handbook of environmental degradation of materials M. Kutz ed. William Andrew Publishing Norwich NY.10.1016/B978-081551500-5.50003-3 ↗
27. Marchand J. Bentz D. Samson E. and Maltais Y. (2001). “Influence of calcium hydroxide dissolution on the transport properties of hydrated cement systems.” Calcium hydroxide in concrete: Materials science of concrete Proc. Workshop on the Role of Calcium Hydroxide in Concrete American Ceramic Society Westerville OH 113–129.
28. 10.1002/pc.75002031010.1002/pc.750020310 ↗
29. Marsden J. G. · 1990
30. Mufti A. A. (2005). “Report on studies of GFRP durability in concrete from field bridge demonstration projects.” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Composites in Construction (CCC 2005) P. Hamelin D. Bigaud E. Ferrier and E. Jacqelin eds. Université Claude Bernard Lyon France 889-895.
31. Performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in tropical environments—Part II: Microstructural tests
32. Murphy K. Zhang S. and Karbhari V. M. (1999). “Effect of concrete based alkaline solutions on short term response of composites.” Proc. 44th Int. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) Symposium and Exhibition L. J. Cohen J. L. Bauer and W. E. Davis eds. SAMPE Covina CA 2222–2230.
33. 10.1002/pse.20510.1002/pse.205 ↗
34. Onofrei M. (2005). “Durability of GFRP reinforced concrete from field demonstration structures Final report.” Univ. of Manitoba Winnipeg MB Canada
35. Porter M. L. and Barnes B. A. (1998). “Accelerated aging degradation of glass fiber composites.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure (ICCI) Vol. 2 Transportation Research Board Washington DC 446–459.
36. Porter M. L. Mehus J. Young K. A. O’Neil E. F. and Barnes B. A. (1997). “Aging for fiber reinforcement in concrete.” Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-3) Vol. 2 Japan Concrete Institute Sapporo Japan 59–66.
37. 10.1201/978143982274610.1201/9781439822746 ↗
38. 10.1016/0010-4361(87)90412-510.1016/0010-4361(87)90412-5 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(66)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(66) ↗
40. 10.1016/0927-796X(94)90002-710.1016/0927-796X(94)90002-7 ↗
41. Durability of E-glass/vinylester reinforcement in alkaline solution
42. 10.1007/BF0035585710.1007/BF00355857 ↗
43. Swit G. · 2000 · 473
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:1(12)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:1(12) ↗
45. 10.1163/15685610074285210.1163/156856100742852 ↗
46. Tosun I. · 2007
47. Valter T. and Ralejs T. (2001). “Durability and service life prediction of GFRP for concrete reinforcement.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Fiber-Reinforced Plastics for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-5) Vol. 1 Thomas Telford London 505–514.
48. Wade L. G. · 2003
49. Wang P. (2005). “Effect of moisture temperature and alkaline on durability of E-glass/vinyl ester reinforcing bars.” Ph.D. thesis Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke PQ Canada.
50. 10.1017/CBO978113917052910.1017/CBO9781139170529 ↗
51. Reaction of alkali-resistant glass fibers with cement. Part I: Review, assessment, and microscopy
52. Zhang S. and Karbhari V. M. (1999). “Effects of alkaline environments on the durability of E-glass fiber composites for use in civil infrastructure.” Proc. 14th Technical Conf. of the American Society of Composites Technomic Publishing Lancaster PA 12–20.
53. 10.1177/00219983930270150310.1177/002199839302701503 ↗