Axial Compressive Behavior of FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns Made of Normal- and High-Strength Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experimental study that was undertaken to investigate the effects of key parameters on the compressive behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns (DSTCs). A total of 24 normal-strength and high-strength concrete-filled DSTCs were manufactured and tested under axial compression. The key parameters examined included the concrete strength; thickness of FRP tube; diameter, strength, and thickness of inner steel tube; and presence (absence) of concrete filling inside it. The results indicate that both normal- and high-strength concretes in a DSTC system is confined effectively by FRP and steel tubes, resulting in a highly ductile compressive behavior. The results also indicate that increasing the inner steel tube diameter leads to an increase in the ultimate axial stress and strain of concrete in DSTCs. It is observed that the concrete filling of the inner steel tubes results in a slight decrease in the ultimate axial strain and a slight increase in ultimate stress of DSTCs. No clear influence of the strength of inner steel tube is observed on the ultimate condition of concrete in DSTCs. It is found that, for a given nominal confinement ratio, an increase in the concrete strength results in a decrease in the ultimate axial strain of DSTCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia (corresponding author).
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Confinement model for axially loaded short rectangular columns strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer wrapping
2. Cheek J. Formichella N. Graetz D. and Varasteh S. (2011). “The behaviour of ultra high strength concrete in FRP confined concrete systems under axial compression.” B.Sc. thesis Civil Engineering Univ. of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia.
3. Confinement model for axially loaded concrete confined by circular fiber-reinforced polymer tubes
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(25)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(25) ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.018 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tws.2010.01.00710.1016/j.tws.2010.01.007 ↗
7. Idris Y. and Ozbakkaloglu T. (2013). “Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete-filled FRP tube columns.” J. Compos. Construct.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000388 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:2(169)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:2(169) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175) ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000006610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000066 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000032110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000321 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.017 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000033410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000334 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000027310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000273 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(469)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(469) ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.014 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:6(538)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:6(538) ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(44)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(44) ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.02110.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.021 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(129)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(129) ↗
22. Seible F. Burgueño R. Abdallah M. G. and Nuismer R. (1996). “Development of advanced composite carbon shell systems for concrete columns in seismic zones.” Proc. 11th World Conf. Earthquake Eng. Pergamon Elsevier Science Oxford.
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(263)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(263) ↗
24. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00012-210.1016/S0958-9465(98)00012-2 ↗
25. Teng J. G. Yu T. and Wong Y. L. (2004). “Behaviour of hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns.” 2nd Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering-CICE 2004 A. A. Balkema Leiden The Netherlands 811–818.10.1201/9780203970850.ch91 ↗
26. Teng J. G. Yu T. and Wong Y. L. (2010). “Hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular structural members.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering Springer Berlin Heidelberg 26–32.10.1007/978-3-642-17487-2_4 ↗
27. Teng J. G. Yu T. Wong Y. L. and Dong S. L. (2005). “Innovative FRP-steel-concrete hybrid columns.” 4th Int. Conf. on Advance in Steel Structure Elsevier Oxford UK 545–554.10.1016/B978-008044637-0/50079-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.017 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000024510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000245 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.012 ↗
32. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.113810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.1138 ↗
33. Yu T. and Teng J. G. (2010). “Hybrid FRP concrete-steel double skin tubular columns with a square outer and a circular inner tube: stub column tests.” 13th Int. Symp. on Tubular Structures CRC Press/Balkema 629–636.10.1201/b10564-87 ↗
34. 10.1260/1369-4332.13.5.96110.1260/1369-4332.13.5.961 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443) ↗