journal article·2007-10

Influence of Reinforcement on the Behavior of Concrete Bridge Deck Slabs Reinforced with FRP Bars

Sherif El-Gamal, Ehab El-Salakawy, Brahim Benmokrane

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experimental study to investigate the role of each layer of reinforcement on the behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. Four full-scale concrete deck slabs of 3,000mm length by 2,500mm width and 200mm depth were constructed and tested in the laboratory. One deck slab was reinforced with top and bottom mats of glass FRP bars. Two deck slabs had only a bottom reinforcement mat with different reinforcement ratios in the longitudinal direction, while the remaining deck slab was constructed with plain concrete without any reinforcement. The deck slabs were supported on two steel girders spaced at 2,000mm center to center and were tested to failure under a central concentrated load. The three reinforced concrete slabs had very similar behavior and failed in punching shear mode at relatively high load levels, whereas the unreinforced slab behaved differently and failed at a very low load level. The experimental punching capacities of the reinforced slabs were compared to the theoretical predictions provided by ACI 318-05, ACI 440.1R-06, and a model proposed by the writers. The tests on the four deck slabs showed that the bottom transverse reinforcement layer has the major influence on the behavior and capacity of the tested slabs. In addition, the ACI 318-05 design method slightly overestimated the punching shear strength of the tested slabs. The ACI 440.1R-06 design method yielded very conservative predictions whereas the proposed method provided reasonable yet conservative predictions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1K 2R1. E-mail: Sherif.El-Gamal@USherbrooke.ca

Canada Research Chair Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 5V6. E-mail: Ehab_Elsalakawy@UManitoba.ca

NSERC Research Chair Professor in FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1K 2Rl (corresponding author). E-mail: Brahim.Benmokrane@USherbrooke.ca

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 1998
2. American Concrete Institute · 2005
3. American Concrete Institute · 2006
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(989)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(989) ↗
5. Bank L. C. and Xi Z. (1995). “Punching shear behaviour of pultruded FRP grating reinforced concrete slabs.” 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-2) L. Taerwe ed. E & FN Spon London 360–367.
6. British Standards Institution (BSI). (1997). Structural use of concrete BS8110: Part 1—Code of practice for design and construction. London.
7. Canadian Standard Association · 2000
8. Canadian Standard Association · 2000
9. Behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with FRP bars under concentrated loads
10. 10.1139/l03-05510.1139/l03-055 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(659)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(659) ↗
12. Punching shear behavior of bridge decks under fatigue loading
13. 10.1139/l02-09210.1139/l02-092 ↗
14. 10.1139/cjce-27-5-83910.1139/cjce-27-5-839 ↗
15. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000415810.1061/JSDEAG.0004158 ↗
16. Strength of reinforced concrete bridge decks under compressive membrane action
17. ISIS Canada. (2001). “Reinforcing concrete structures with fiber reinforced polymers.” ISIS-M03-01 Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence on Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures Univ. of Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
18. 10.1139/cjce-27-3-47510.1139/cjce-27-3-475 ↗
19. Kinnunen S. and Nylander H. (1960). “Punching of concrete slabs without shear reinforcement.” Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology No. 158 Stockholm Sweden.
20. Punching shear behaviour of restrained reinforced concrete slabs
21. Limaye V. N. (2004). “Steel-free bridge decks under cyclic loading: A study of crack propagation and strength degradation.” Ph.D. thesis DalTech Dalhousie Univ. Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
22. Newhook J. P. and Mufti A. A. (1995). “Fiber reinforced concrete deck slabs without steel reinforcement—Half-scale testing and mathematical formulation.” Research Rep. No . 1 Technical Univ. of Nova Scotia Halifax Canada.
23. OHBDC. (1991). “Ontario highway bridge design code (OHBDC).” Ministry of Transportation of Ontario Downsview Ontario Canada.
24. Thorburn J. (1998). “A study of externally reinforced fibre-reinforced concrete bridge decks on steel girders.” Ph.D. thesis Civil Engineering Dept. Dalhousie Univ. Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.