journal article·2025-02

Seismic Performance Assessment of GFRP-RC Circular Columns under High Torsion Combined with Bending and Shear Cyclic Loading

Yasser M. Selmy, Amr E. Abdallah, Ehab F. El-Salakawy

Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents the results of an investigation into the seismic performance of six large-scale concrete circular columns reinforced with glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement. Among these columns, one underwent concentric reversed cyclic lateral loading, causing bending and shear, while the remaining five columns experienced eccentric cyclic lateral loading, causing additional torsional stresses. The test variables included the torsion-to-bending moment ratio, transverse and longitudinal reinforcement ratios, and concrete compressive strength. The test results indicated that the concurrent cyclic torsion and lateral drift reversals significantly altered the behavior of concrete members in terms of mode of failure, lateral load resistance, drift capacity, and energy dissipation. It was found that adequately confined columns exhibited a notable reduction in concrete core deterioration, thereby preventing the decline in both bending and torsional strength. Furthermore, the paper examined the validity of the North American design provisions predicting the torsional strength of GFRP-reinforced concrete members subjected to combined seismic loading. Amendments to the GFRP tensile stress limits specified in these provisions were introduced, yielding better and safer predictions for the torque capacity of the tested columns.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada; Assistant Lecturer, Civil Engineering Dept., Suez Canal Univ., Ismailia 41522, Egypt. ORCID: .

Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Assiut Univ., Assiut 71515, Egypt. ORCID: .

Professor of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada (corresponding author). ORCID: .

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP–reinforced concrete, 122. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000110810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001108 ↗
3. Abdallah, A. E., and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2021b. “Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete circular columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (5): 221–234. https://doi.org/10.14359/51732831.
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11409210.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114092 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000119510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001195 ↗
6. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary, 9. ACI CODE-374.1-05 (R2019). Detroit: ACI.
7. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and commentary, 1–255. ACI CODE-440.11-22. Detroit: ACI.
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000063710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000637 ↗
9. Almomani, M., K. Mahmoud, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2022. “Effect of slenderness ratio on glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced high-strength concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J. 119 (2): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.14359/51734343.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000172910.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001729 ↗
11. Belarbi, A., Q. Li, and S. S. Prakash. 2009. “Torsional effects on seismic performance of square vs. circular RC bridge columns.” In Proc., 25th US-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
12. Belarbi, A., S. S. Prakash, and P. Silva. 2008. “Flexure-shear-torsion interaction of RC bridge columns.” In Proc., Concrete Bridge Conf., 17. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
13. Belarbi, A., S. S. Prakash, and P. F. Silva. 2010. “Incorporation of decoupled damage index models in the performance-based evaluation of RC circular and square bridge columns under combined loadings.” ACI Spec. Publ. 271: 79–102. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663891.
14. Caltrans. 2019. “Seismic Design Criteria (SDC).” Version 2. Bridge Design Specifications State of California Dept. of Transportation Sacramento CA.
15. 10.1002/tal.147910.1002/tal.1479 ↗
16. Choo, C. C., I. E. Harik, and H. Gesund. 2006. “Strength of rectangular concrete columns reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (3): 452–459. https://doi.org/10.14359/15324.
17. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019a. Canadian highway bridge design code, 1092. CSA S6-19. Toronto: CSA.
18. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019b. Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practices for concrete. CSA A23.1-19/A23.2-19. Toronto: CSA.
19. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019c. National standard of Canada specification for fibre-reinforced, 67. CSA S807. Toronto: CSA.
20. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2021. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers, 208. CSA S806-12 (R2021). Toronto: CSA.
21. De Luca, A., F. Matta, and A. Nanni. 2010. “Behavior of full-scale glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns under axial load.” ACI Struct. J. 107 (5): 589–596. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663912.
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000093810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000938 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000100810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11017410.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110174 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000073410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000734 ↗
26. Hsu, T. T. C., and Y. L. Mo. 1985. “Softening of concrete in torsional members—Theory and tests.” ACI Struct. J. 82 (3): 290–303.
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000061410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000614 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11103710.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111037 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000073710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000737 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000098810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000988 ↗
31. MacGregor, J. G., and M. G. Ghoneim. 1995. “Design for torsion.” ACI Struct. J. 92 (2): 211–218. https://doi.org/10.14359/1152.
32. Mitchell, B. Y. D., and M. P. Collins. 1974. “Diagonal compression field theory—A rational model for structural concrete in pure torsion.” ACI J. Proc. 71 (8): 396–408. https://doi.org/10.14359/7103.
33. 10.14359/5168782410.14359/51687824 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000083910.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000839 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000077710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000777 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.02910.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.029 ↗
37. Otsuka, H., E. Takeshita, W. Yabuki, Y. Wang, T. Yoshimura, and M. Tsunomoto. 2004. “Study on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns subjected to torsional moment, bending moment and axial force.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC: 13 WCEE Secretariat.
38. Ping, C. Z., W. Su, and Y. Yang. 2021. “Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete T-shaped columns under compression-flexure-shear and torsion combined action.” Earthquakes Struct. 20 (4): 431–444. https://doi.org/10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2023.02.014.
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11486310.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114863 ↗
40. Prakash, S. S., and A. Belarbi. 2009. “Shear-flexure-torsion interaction features of reinforced concrete bridge columns—An experimental study.” ACI Spec. Publ. 265: 427–453. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663307.
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.014 ↗
42. Prakash, S. S., Q. Li, and A. Belarbi. 2012. “Behavior of circular and square reinforced concrete bridge columns under combined loading including torsion.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (3): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.14359/51683745.
43. Pultrall Inc. 2019. V-ROD—Technical data sheet. Thetford Mines, QC: ADS Composites Group.
44. Saatcioglu, M., and S. R. Razvi. 2002. “Displacement-Based design of reinforced concrete columns for confinement.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.14359/11030.
45. Selmy, Y. M., A. E. Abdallah, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2022. “Non-linear finite element analysis of GFRP-RC circular columns subjected to simulated earthquake loading.” In Vol. 348 of Proc., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf., edited by R. Gupta, et al., 623–633. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
46. Selmy, Y. M., A. E. Abdallah, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2024. “Evaluation of hysteretic energy and damping capacity of GFRP-RC columns under cyclic loading.” ACI Spec. Publ. 360: 628–647. https://doi.org/10.14359/51740653.
47. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11435510.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114355 ↗
48. Selmy, Y. M., and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2024a. “A comparative analysis of GFRP- and steel-RC columns under combined shear, flexure, and torsion loads.” ACI Spec. Publ. 360: 442–461. https://doi.org/10.14359/51740642.
49. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10568010.1016/j.istruc.2023.105680 ↗
50. Selmy, Y. M., F. Ye, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2021. “Seismic performance of GFRP-RC rectangular columns: Numerical study.” In Vol. 8 of Proc. Int. Structural Engineering and Construction. (STR-49), 1–6. Fargo, ND: ISEC Press.
51. 10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.46310.12989/eas.2014.7.4.463 ↗
52. Sheikh, S., and Z. Kharal. 2018. “GFRP-reinforced concrete columns subjected to seismic loads.” ACI Spec. Publ. 326: 56.1–56.10.
53. 10.14359/5168722710.14359/51687227 ↗
54. 10.1080/1363246060103181310.1080/13632460601031813 ↗
55. Tobbi, H., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2014. “Behavior of concentrically loaded fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns with varying reinforcement types and ratios.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (2): 375–385. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686528.