journal article·2018-10

Numerical Simulation of Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns under Close-Range Blast Loading

Weiqiang Wang, Chengqing Wu, Jun Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns (DSTCs) are a new form of composite columns that consist of an outer FRP tube and an inner steel tube, with the space between them filled with concrete. Although many studies have been conducted on the hybrid DSTCs, no studies have been conducted on their behavior under blast loading. This study presents the results of a numerical study on the behavior of hybrid DSTCs under close-in blast loading. Numerical models of hybrid DSTCs are developed using finite-element code LS-DYNA, and the reliability of the developed models are validated with available testing results. With the validated models, numerical simulations are carried out to investigate the structural responses of hybrid DSTCs under blast loading. The simulation results indicate that the hybrid DSTCs behave in a ductile manner under blast loading. The outer FRP tube can effectively provide confinement to the infilled concrete, and the inner steel tube plays a key role in resisting the blast loading. Detailed parametric analyses are conducted to investigate the influences of different parameters on the blast behavior of hybrid DSTCs. The blast resistance capacities of the hybrid DSTCs, concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs), and concrete-filled double-skin steel tubes (CFDSTs) are compared and discussed based on the simulation results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Associate, Center for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

Professor, Center for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia (corresponding author).

Lecturer, Center for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.04810.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.048 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.03.01010.1016/j.tws.2008.03.010 ↗
3. Béton C.-I. · 1993
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.009 ↗
5. 10.1177/00219983870210090410.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
6. 10.1139/cjce-2012-051010.1139/cjce-2012-0510 ↗
7. Retrofit of reinforced concrete structures to resist blast effects
8. Design of concrete-filled circular steel tubes under lateral impact
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000076210.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000762 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(34)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(34) ↗
11. Behavior of axially loaded concrete-filled circular fiber-reinforced polymer tubes
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.025 ↗
13. Hallquist J. O. · 2007
14. 10.1016/j.tws.2010.01.00710.1016/j.tws.2010.01.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.03.01110.1016/j.tws.2014.03.011 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000125110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001251 ↗
17. 10.1163/15685510175339665410.1163/156855101753396654 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.02.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.02.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.02810.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.028 ↗
20. Malvar L. J. and J. E. Crawford. 1998. “Dynamic increase factors for concrete.” In Proc. 28th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar. Washington DC: Dept. of Defense.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(601)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(601) ↗
22. 10.1016/1359-8368(95)00019-410.1016/1359-8368(95)00019-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.02910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.029 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000098110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000981 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000050210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000502 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000137010.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001370 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000044410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000444 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.00710.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.007 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000001210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000012 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.017 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.06.02210.1016/j.tws.2015.06.022 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.06.01910.1016/j.tws.2015.06.019 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000069010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000690 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.06110.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.061 ↗
35. Welsh L. M. and J. Harding. 1985. “Dynamic tensile response of unidirectionally reinforced carbon epoxy and glass epoxy composites.” In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Composite Materials edited by W. C. Harrigan Jr. J. Strife and A. K. Dhingra. 1517–1531. San Diego CA: TMS Composite Committee.
36. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.04510.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.045 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000015910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000159 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000012110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000121 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443) ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000080010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000800 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.08.02010.1016/j.tws.2015.08.020 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.02.02010.1016/j.tws.2015.02.020 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.02210.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.022 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.011 ↗