journal article·2022-12

Short- and Long-Term Prestress Losses in Basalt FRP Prestressed Concrete Beams under Sustained Loading

Ana Pavlović, Ted Donchev, Diana Petkova, Mukesh Limbachiya

Publisher page

Abstract

The favorable mechanical properties of basalt fiber–reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars, such as their excellent strength-to-weight ratio, resistance to corrosion, lower environmental impact, and electromagnetic neutrality, make them attractive for internal reinforcement of concrete elements with specific service requirements. Prestressing has emerged as a possible method for limiting the deflections and cracking of BFRP-reinforced flexural RC elements. However, long-term behavior of such structural members has not yet been investigated extensively. Therefore, this paper aims to give information on long-term behavior and prestress losses of pretensioned BFRP-reinforced concrete beams based on the collected experimental data. The testing program includes long-term analysis of six BFRP concrete beams pretensioned to different prestress levels—namely, 20%, 30%, and 40% of the ultimate tensile capacity of the bars. The monitored testing stages included initial tensioning of the bars, casting and curing of concrete, transfer of prestressing force to the concrete, long-term unloaded phase after transfer, sustained-loading application, long-term sustained loading phase, unloading, and final destructive testing, conducted in a controlled indoor environment. During all phases of the testing, strain levels in the BFRP bars and deflections were continuously monitored. The results of continuous strain monitoring show that the average loss of strain over the period of initial 90 days of unloaded monitoring was 7% of the initial strain. During the following 6 months of monitoring under sustained loading, an additional 0.3% reduction was recorded on average. The loss was dependent on the initial strain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction Management, Kingston Univ., Penrhyn Rd., Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: .

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction Management, Kingston Univ., Penrhyn Rd., Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK.

Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction Management, Kingston Univ., Penrhyn Rd., Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK.

Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction Management, Kingston Univ., Penrhyn Rd., Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000100210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.10610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.106 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11118210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111182 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11217210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112172 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.062 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.10910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.109 ↗
8. Bentz, E. 2000. Sectional analysis of reinforced concrete members. Toronto: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
9. BSI (British Standards Institution). 2002. Testing hardened concrete – Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. British Standard 12390-3:2002. London: BSI.
10. CEN (European Committee for standardization). 1992. Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2, EN 1992-1-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
11. Crossett, P., S. Taylor, D. Robinson, M. Sonebi, E. Garcia-Taengua, P. Deegan Banagher, and L. Ferrara. 2015. The flexural behavior of SCC beams pre-stressed with BFRP. Chesterfield, UK: NetComposites.
12. Czigány, T. 2005. “Basalt fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites.” Mater. Sci. Forum 473–474: 59–66.
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.011 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000087610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000876 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000085110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000851 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000048710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000487 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.07410.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.074 ↗
19. Gao, Y., Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, X. Kong, B. Zhang, S. Liu, J. Feng, N. Zhu, H. Fan, and F. Jin. 2020. “Blast responses of one-way sea-sand seawater concrete slabs reinforced with BFRP bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 232: 117254.
20. He, W., X. Wang, and Z. Wu. 2020. “Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with prestressed and non-prestressed BFRP grids.” Compos. Struct. 246: 112381.
21. Hou, W., Z. Q. Li, W. Y. Gao, P. D. Zheng, and Z. X. Guo. 2020. “Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with BFRP bars-reinforced ECC matrix.” Compos. Struct. 241: 112092.
22. Inman, M., E. R. Thorhallsson, and K. Azrague. 2017. “A mechanical and environmental assessment and comparison of basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebar and steel rebar in concrete beams.” Energy Procedia 111: 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.005.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.005 ↗
23. Kim Y. J. M. F. Green and R. Gordon Wight. 2014. “2 - Prestressed fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for concrete structures in flexure: Fundamentals to applications.” In Advanced composites in bridge construction and repair edited by Y. J. Kim 30–60. Sawston UK: Woodhead Publishing.10.1533/9780857097019.1.30 ↗
24. Li, Z., T. Xiao, Q. Pan, J. Cheng, and S. Zhao. 2016. “Corrosion behavior and mechanism of basalt fibers in acidic and alkaline environments.” Corros. Sci. 110: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.04.019.10.1016/j.corsci.2016.04.019 ↗
25. Lu, Z., L. Su, G. Xian, B. Lu, and J. Xie. 2020. “Durability study of concrete-covered basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars in marine environment.” Compos. Struct. 234: 111650.
26. Madotto, R., N. C. van Engelen, S. Das, G. Russo, and M. Pauletta. 2021. “Shear and flexural strengthening of RC beams using BFRP fabrics.” Eng. Struct. 229: 111606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111606.10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111606 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10821510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108215 ↗
28. Mirshekari, M., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, and M. Limbachiya. 2015. “Influence of the degree of prestressing on the behavior of BFRP reinforced beams.” In Proc., Joint Conf. FRPRCS-12 & APFIS-2015. Nanjing, China: Southeast University.
29. Mirshekari, M., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, and M. Limbachiya. 2016. “Deformability of pretensioned PC beams with BFRP reinforcement.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11259210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112592 ↗
31. Nkurunziz, G., B. Benmokrane, A. S. Debaiky, and R. Masmoudi. 2005. “Effect of sustained load and environment on long term tensile properties of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars.” ACI Struct. J. 102 (4): 615–621.
32. Pavlović A. T. Donchev D. Petkova and M. Limbachiya. 2019a. “Initial estimate of short and long-term prestress losses of BFRP pretensioned RC beams.” In Proc. 14th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures. Belfast Northern Ireland: Queens University Belfast.
33. Pavlović, A., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, and M. Limbachiya. 2021. “Experimental investigation into the creep behavior of basalt FRP bars.” In Proc., fib Symp. Concrete Structures: New Trends for Eco-Efficiency and Performance. Switzerland: FIB International.
34. Pavlović, A., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, M. Limbachiya, and R. Almuhaisen. 2019b. “Pretensioned BFRP reinforced concrete beams: Flexural behavior and estimation of initial prestress losses.” MATEC Web Conf. 289: 09001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928909001.10.1051/matecconf/201928909001 ↗
35. Pavlović, A., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, and N. Staletovic. 2022. “Sustainability of alternative reinforcement for concrete structures: Life cycle assessment of basalt FRP bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 334 (108): 127424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127424.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127424 ↗
36. Pearson, M., and T. Donchev. 2013. “Experimental study on the behavior of prestressed concrete beams with internal BFRP reinforcement.” In Proc., 11th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures. Guimaraes, Portugal: University of Minho.
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.045 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.01810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.11810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.118 ↗
40. Singha, K. 2012. “A short review on basalt fiber.” Int. J. Text. Sci. 1 (4): 19–28.
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12043710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120437 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.039 ↗
43. Thorhallsson, E., and S. H. Gudmundsson. 2013. “Test of prestressed basalt FRP concrete beams with and without external stirrups.” In Proc., fib Symp. Engineering a Concrete Future: Technology, Modelling & Construction. Switzerland: FIB International.
44. Thorhallsson, E., and B. S. Jonsson. 2012. “Test of prestressed concrete beams with BFRP tendons.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. London: Infonomics Society.
45. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000049110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000491 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.00910.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.009 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000064910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000649 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.00910.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.009 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.05310.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.053 ↗
50. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000051710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000517 ↗
51. 10.1177/002199831452662810.1177/0021998314526628 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.086 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.00710.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.007 ↗
54. Zhou, Q., et al. 2021. “Blast resistance evaluation of urban utility tunnel reinforced with BFRP bars.” Defence Technol. 17 (2): 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.015.10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.015 ↗
55. 10.1201/b1580610.1201/b15806 ↗