Evaluation by Hybrid Simulation of Earthquake-Damaged RC Walls Repaired for In-Plane Bending with Single-Sided CFRP Sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
The realistic seismic response of two damaged reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls repaired using externally bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets was evaluated using hybrid simulation. The CFRP repair used horizontal and vertical CFRP layers applied to a single side of the wall that were anchored with a steel tube anchor system and CFRP fan anchors. The objective of the CFRP repair was to restore the initial stiffness and restore or increase the strength, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of the damaged walls. Hybrid simulation was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the repair strategy under real earthquake ground motion records with realistic boundary conditions, including the effects of axial load, shear force, and overturning moment. The results show that the single-sided application of the CFRP sheets restored the seismic performance of the damaged RC shear walls tested in this study. Hybrid simulation is shown to be an efficient test method to experimentally study the seismic response of a structural component with realistic boundary conditions over a range of earthquake hazard levels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). ORCID: .
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbiati G. · 2015 · 8310.1007/978-3-319-10136-1_7 ↗
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute) · 2017
3. Cyclic tests on seismically damaged reinforced concrete walls strengthened using fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement
4. ASCE · 2013
5. ASTM · 2014
6. ASTM · 2017
7. ASTM · 2019
8. ASTM · 2020
9. ASTM · 2020
10. 10.1785/012004018210.1785/0120040182 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(673)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(673) ↗
12. Charlet A. 2007. “Hybrid simulation and its application to the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames.” M.S. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of British Columbia
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000047810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000478 ↗
14. CSA (Canadian Standard Association) · 2012
15. CSA (Canadian Standard Association) · 2019
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000132810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001328 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.093 ↗
18. Eatherton M. R. · 2010
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000031210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000312 ↗
20. Elnady M. 2008. “Seismic rehabilitation of RC structural walls.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering McMaster Univ.
21. Ghobarah A. · 2004
22. Hiotakis S. 2004. “Repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete shear walls for earthquake resistance using externally bonded carbon fibre sheets and a novel anchor system.” M.S. thesis Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carleton Univ.
23. Hiotakis S. D. Lau and N. Londono. 2004. “Research on seismic retrofit and rehabilitation of reinforced concrete shear walls using FRP materials.” In Proc. Joint National Science Council Taiwan - National Research Council Canada NSC-NRC Workshop on Construction Technologies 17–26. Ottawa Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
24. 10.1080/1363246050935054210.1080/13632460509350542 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.022 ↗
26. 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.239-27810.5459/bnzsee.44.4.239-278 ↗
27. 10.1002/eqe.237410.1002/eqe.2374 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.03210.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.032 ↗
29. 10.1177/204141961773235310.1177/2041419617732353 ↗
30. Lombard J. · 2000 · 1
31. McKenna F. G. Fenves H. Scott and B. Jeremic. 2000. “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) [computer software].” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Univ. of California at Berkeley. Accessed December 2018. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.000000210.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002 ↗
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199912)28:12<1541::AID-EQE880>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199912)28:12<1541::AID-EQE880>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
34. 10.1002/eqe.17610.1002/eqe.176 ↗
35. Negro P. · 2004 · 1
36. NRC (National Research Council) · 2015
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:5(606)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:5(606) ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000081310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000813 ↗
39. Real-time hybrid simulation of seismically isolated structures with full-scale bearings and large computational models
40. Schellenberg A. S. Mahin and G. Fenves. 2009. Advanced implementation of hybrid simulation. PEER Rep. No. 2009/104. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering Univ. of California Berkeley.
41. 10.1016/0143-974X(94)90059-010.1016/0143-974X(94)90059-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-610.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-6 ↗
43. 10.1002/eqe.80410.1002/eqe.804 ↗
44. 10.1193/1.242956410.1193/1.2429564 ↗
45. Wallace J. · 2015 · 1
46. Effect of ground motion sequence on response of squat reinforced concrete shear walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000912 ↗
47. Woods J. 2019. “Advances in retrofit and testing of reinforced concrete shear walls Part 1 - seismic retrofit of deficient walls with fibre-reinforced polymer sheets Part 2 - building scale performance evaluation using hybrid simulation.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carleton Univ.
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000070510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000705 ↗
49. Woods J. · 2017 · 1
50. 10.1002/eqe.84810.1002/eqe.848 ↗