journal article·2024-10

Experimental Investigation of Fatigue Shear Behavior of RC Beams Strengthened with FRP Bars Using Embedded Through-Section Technique

Linh Van Hong Bui, Tetsushi Ohno, Norihiko Kurihara, Hidehiko Sekiya

Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents the results of an experimental investigation of fatigue shear behavior in reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars using the embedded through-section (ETS) technique. Thirteen ETS-FRP-strengthened beams were tested under two scenarios of medium-cycle fatigue (MCF) and high-cycle fatigue (HCF). The design variables were the number of stirrups, the FRP type, and the FRP size, and their effect on the fatigue characteristics of ETS-retrofitted RC beams was examined. The displacement and strain in flexural and shear reinforcement in the ETS-strengthened beams increased during the initial cycles and tended to stabilize during the rest of the fatigue process. Under MCF and HCF conditions, the fatigue stress ranges for longitudinal steel with ETS-FRP-strengthened beams satisfy the limits mandated in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials code. Similar to previous studies, the maximum strain of 2,000 µɛ in the ETS-FRP strengthening systems can be considered the strain limit for the fatigue design of ETS-FRP-retrofitted beams. The use of glass FRP bars with a narrow spacing substantially extended the fatigue life of ETS-strengthened beams (to more than 3,000,000 cycles) compared with unstrengthened beams and beams retrofitted with carbon FRP bars. Conversely, a large number of stirrups reduced the contribution of ETS-FRP strengthening. The strength of the retrofitted beams increased with increasing FRP elastic modulus and bar diameter. Failure of ETS-FRP-strengthened beams under fatigue tests and static tests occurred in a safe and ductile manner because no rupture of the steel stirrups or the FRP bars occurred, and no early FRP debonding was observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Assistant Professor, Advanced Retrofit Technology International Center, Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya 158-8557, Japan (corresponding author). ORCID: .

Graduate Student, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya 158-8557, Japan. ORCID: .

Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya 158-8557, Japan.

Professor, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya 158-8557, Japan.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2023. Design and construction of externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) systems for strengthening concrete structures—Guide. ACI PRC-440.2-23. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
3. Al-Hammoud, R., K. Soudki, and T. H. Topper. 2010. “Fatigue flexural behavior of corroded reinforced concrete beams repaired with CFRP sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000144.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000144 ↗
4. Al-Lebban, Y. F., and K. R. Mackie. 2018. “Polyurethane-FRP external strengthening of RC beams with no steel stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (1): 04018074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000916.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000916 ↗
5. ASTM. 2023. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-23. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000122210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001222 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.025 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000123510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001235 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000105510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001055 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1418541210.3390/ma14185412 ↗
12. 10.1002/cepa.274310.1002/cepa.2743 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000009510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000095 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000017410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000174 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000068910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000689 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11133710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111337 ↗
17. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2017. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12 R. Mississauga, ON: CSA.
18. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Rexdale, ON: CSA.
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.001 ↗
20. Dirar, S., and M. Theofanous. 2017. “Large-scale reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened in shear with embedded GFRP bars.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Advanced Composites in Construction (ACIC 2017), Sheffield, September 5–7, 2017, 114–119. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(93)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(93) ↗
22. El-Bahy, A., S. Kunnath, W. Stone, and A. Taylor. 1999. “Cumulative seismic damage of circular bridge columns: Variable amplitude tests.” ACI Struct. J. 96 (5): 711–719.
23. El-Saikaly, G., and O. Chaallal. 2014. “Extending the fatigue life of reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened in shear with externally bonded FRP: Upgrading versus repairing.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000492.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000492 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.014 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000088510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000885 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000102710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001027 ↗
27. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-401510.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4015 ↗
28. 10.1002/suco.20230060310.1002/suco.202300603 ↗
29. FIB (Fédération Internationale du Béton). 2019. Externally applied FRP reinforcement for RC structures. Bulletin 90. Lausanne: FIB.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:1(69)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:1(69) ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000121210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001212 ↗
32. Isojeh, B., M. El-Zeghayar, and F. J. Vecchio. 2017a. “Concrete damage under fatigue loading in uniaxial compression.” ACI. Mater. J. 114 (2): 225–235. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689477.
33. 10.14359/5170079210.14359/51700792 ↗
34. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2007. Recommendations for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fiber reinforcing materials. Vol. C. Tokyo: JSCE.
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000104810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001048 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.02610.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.026 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453) ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000029210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000292 ↗
39. Nagesh, H. E., and G. A. Rao. 2016. “Fatigue behavior of lightly reinforced concrete beams in flexure due to overload.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (FraMCoS-9), edited by V. Saouma, J. Bolander, and E. Landis. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000061010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000610 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000113910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001139 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11362210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113622 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1501034110.3390/ma15010341 ↗
44. 10.1680/stbu.2009.162.5.31110.1680/stbu.2009.162.5.311 ↗
45. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000022810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000228 ↗
46. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-376410.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3764 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000030210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000302 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000018910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000189 ↗
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(446)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(446) ↗