Experimental Investigations on Seismically Damaged Nonrectangular Reinforced-Concrete Structural Walls Repaired by FRPs
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on four nonrectangular reinforced-concrete (RC) wall specimens. These specimens were damaged in previous tests with associated axial and lateral load and were subsequently repaired and strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). The specimens include two L-shaped specimens and two T-shaped specimens. Results highlight that most of the strength and stiffness of the original specimens were recovered by the repair process. Compared to the original specimens, the ductility of the repaired specimens did not reduce significantly. Other aspects of the repaired wall including the failure mechanisms, hysteresis responses, deformation component, and stiffness characteristics are also discussed and compared with the original specimens. The current available methods for estimating strength and stiffness of the repaired walls with externally bonded FRPs are also evaluated and discussed based on the experimental data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., 50 Nanyang Ave., Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., 50 Nanyang Ave., Singapore 639798, Singapore (corresponding author).
Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi Univ., 100 University Ave., Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2008). “Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures.” 440.2R-08 Farmington Hills MI.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2011). “Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11) and commentary (318 R-11).” 318-11 Farmington Hills MI.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(236)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(236) ↗
4. 10.1080/1363246080200327210.1080/13632460802003272 ↗
5. Forum 8 [Computer software]. Tokyo Engineer’s Studio.
6. FYFE Asia Pte. Ltd. (2002). “TYFO SEH-51a data sheet.” Singapore.
7. FYFE Asia Pte. Ltd. (2004). “TYFO EI-R data sheet.” Singapore.
8. FYFE Asia Pte. Ltd. (2007). “TYFO SCH-41 data sheet.” Singapore.
9. Hines E. M. (2002). “Seismic performance of hollow rectangular reinforced concrete bridge piers with confined corner elements.” Ph.D. thesis Univ. of California San Diego.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1177)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1177) ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000011010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000110 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000016310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000163 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000033610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000336 ↗
14. Lombard J. C. (1999). “Seismic strengthening and repair of reinforced concrete shear walls using externally bonded carbon fibre tow sheets.” M.E. thesis Carleton Univ. Ottawa.
15. Penelis G. G. · 1997
16. Priestley M. G. Calvi M. and Kowalsky M. J. (2007). “Direct displacement-based seismic design of structures.” 5th New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conf. Palmerston North New Zealand.
17. 10.1002/978047017285810.1002/9780470172858 ↗
18. Teng J. G. Lu X. Z. Ye L. P. and Jiang J. J. (2004). “Recent research on intermediate crack induced debonding in FRP strengthened beams.” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Advanced Composite Materials for Bridges and Structures Calgary AB Canada.
19. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-610.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-6 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618) ↗
21. 10.1002/pse.6110.1002/pse.61 ↗