Source abstract
Abstract
There are many situations where strengthening might be required for a nonprismatic reinforced concrete section (i.e., a beam or slab where the depth of the section varies along its length). For example, many bridges in the United Kingdom have inadequate capacity to carry accidental vehicle loads on verges. These shallow depth verges are often cantilevered from the much deeper main bridge deck. The cantilever might be strengthened by applying fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites to the top surface of the cantilever, extending transversely onto the bridge deck. However, a problem may exist with such a situation due to the potential for a dramatic reduction in the degree of strengthening which is achievable. This is due to the effects of cracking, and longitudinal shear stresses. Tests presented in this paper demonstrate that in regions where little or no cracking occurs, local or global debonding of the external FRP may result. Therefore, the strength of some nonprismatic beams, as predicted by current design guidelines, is often shown to be overly conservative and, in one case significantly unconservative. However, more importantly, the predicted failure modes and FRP strains often do not correspond to those observed. Advice on the best approach for analyzing these beams is given.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Senior Lecturer, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K. (corresponding author).
Director of Bridge and Structural Engineering, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd., Queen Victoria House, Redland Hill, Bristol BS6 6US, U.K.; presently, Visiting Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
Professor, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 440. (2002). “Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures.” ACI 440.2R-02 Detroit.
2. Blaschko M. Niedermeier R. and Zilch K. (1998). “Bond failure modes of flexural members strengthened with FRP.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure Tucson Ariz. 315–327.
3. Concrete Society. (2004). “Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures using fibre composite materials.” Technical Rep. No. 55 2nd Ed. Camberley U.K.
4. Fédération Internationale du Béton (FIB). (2001). “Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures.” Bulletin 14 Lausanne Switzerland.
6. Maeda T. Asano Y. Sato Y. Ueda T. and Katuto Y. (1997). “A study on bond mechanism of carbon fibre sheet.” Nonmetallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Sapporo Japan Japan Concrete Institute Tokyo 279–285.
7. Neubauer U. and Rostasy F. S. (1997). “Design aspects of concrete structures strengthened with externally bonded CFRP-plates.” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Structural Faults and Repair Edinburgh U.K. ECS Publications Edinburgh 109–118.
8. Niedermeier R. (2000). “Zugkraftdeckung bei klebearmierten bauteilen.” Doctoral dissertation TU München München Germany in German.
10.1002/best.200101000 ↗