journal article·2021-08

Shear Behavior of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beams with Draped FRP Tendons and without Transverse Reinforcement

Fei Peng, Weichen Xue

Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate the shear behavior of post-tensioned concrete beams with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements, six large-scale post-tensioned beams without transverse reinforcement and with a shear span-to-effective depth ratio of approximately 3.0 were tested to failure. All beams were longitudinally reinforced with draped prestressed carbon FRP tendons and non-prestressed glass FRP bars. The test variables included the amount of flexural reinforcement and the prestressing level. With the aid of full-field measurement on the beam surface using digital image correlation, the kinematics of the critical shear crack of each beam were tracked. Two shear failure modes, including shear compression and shear tension, were observed in the tested beams. Generally, when the amount of flexural reinforcement increased, there was a corresponding increase in the maximum shear force. When the total prestressing force was increased from 360 to 440 kN, the shear cracking strength and the maximum shear strength increased by 6.9% and 10.0%, respectively. It was demonstrated that an arch mechanism formed in the tested FRP post-tensioned beams, although the contribution of aggregate interlock to the shear capacity was negligible. The predictions of the shear capacity calculated from various shear design models showed that the American and Japanese recommendations were highly conservative, whereas the Canadian recommendations were more consistent with the experimental results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China.

Professor, Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China; Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). ORCID: .

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2004. Prestressing concrete structures with FRP tendons. ACI 440.4R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2012. Guide test methods for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for reinforcing or strengthening concrete and masonry structures. ACI 440.3R-12. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
3. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000024810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000248 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000034210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000342 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1877)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1877) ↗
8. 10.14359/5171801210.14359/51718012 ↗
9. CNS (China National Standard). 2019. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. GB/T 50081. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
10. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
11. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-14. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000064810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000648 ↗
13. Grace, N., M. Bebawy, and K. Ushijima. 2014. “Field application of composite post-tensioning system.” Concr. Int. 36 (11): 39–42.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000052410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000524 ↗
15. Grace, N. F., S. B. Singh, M. M. Shinouda, and S. S. Mathew. 2005. “Concrete beams prestressed with CFRP.” Concr. Int. 27 (2): 60–64.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000034510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000345 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.02510.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.07910.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.079 ↗
19. 10.1002/suco.20190008510.1002/suco.201900085 ↗
20. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 1997. Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fibre reinforcing materials. CLI31-1. Tokyo: JSCE.
21. 10.1002/suco.20170017410.1002/suco.201700174 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.11008810.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110088 ↗
23. Muttoni, A., and M. F. Ruiz. 2008. “Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement as function of critical shear crack width.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.14359/19731.
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000045010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000450 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000032610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000326 ↗
26. 10.15554/pcij.01011999.74.8510.15554/pcij.01011999.74.85 ↗
27. Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2017. “Evaluation of shear design provisions of prestressed concrete beams with FRP reinforcements.” In Proc., 6th Asia-Pacific Conf. on FRP in Structures, 1–4. Singapore: FRP Application Committee of Chinese Civil Engineering Society.
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.09110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.091 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000090310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000903 ↗
30. Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2020. “Database evaluation of shear strength of slender fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete members.” ACI Struct. J. 117 (3): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.14359/51723504.
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:5(452)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:5(452) ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000048310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000483 ↗
33. Reineck, K. H. 1991. “Ultimate shear force of structural concrete members without transverse reinforcement derived from a mechanical model (SP-885).” ACI Struct. J. 88 (5): 592–602. https://doi.org/10.14359/2784.
34. Saqan, E. I., and R. J. Frosch. 2009. “Influence of flexural reinforcement on shear strength of prestressed concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.14359/56284.
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000097810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000978 ↗
36. Sneed, L. H., and J. A. Ramirez. 2014. “Influence of cracking on behavior and shear strength of reinforced concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (1): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686438.
37. Tureyen, A. K., and R. J. Frosch. 2002. “Shear tests of FRP-reinforced concrete beams without stirrups.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 427–434. https://doi.org/10.14359/12111.
38. Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. Proc. 83 (2): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.14359/10416.
39. 10.1177/168781401881687910.1177/1687814018816879 ↗
40. Xie, L., E. C. Bentz, and M. P. Collins. 2011. “Influence of axial stress on shear response of reinforced concrete elements.” ACI Struct. J. 108 (6): 745–754. https://doi.org/10.14359/51683373.
41. Yonekura, A., E. Tazawa, and H. Nakayama. 1993. Flexural and shear behavior of prestressed concrete beams using FRP rods as prestressing tendons. SP138-32, 525-548. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:4(268)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:4(268) ↗