Influence of the PBO-FRCM Composite Configuration on the Shear Capacity of RC Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the results of tests that will be carried out on beams strengthened in shear with polybenzoxazole fabric–reinforced cementitious matrix (PBO-FRCM) composites will be presented and compared with the results of theoretical calculations. Tests will be carried out on 12 RC T beams strengthened in shear with anchored or unanchored PBO-FRCM stirrups with different widths and spacing. Strain gauges and the digital image correlation (DIC) method will be used to measure the deformation of the composite. The mechanisms of failure of the beams will be analyzed and described. The shear capacity will be calculated based on the characteristics of the materials and the specimens used in the tests. The results of the calculations that are based on the latest standards and theoretical modeling showed that the shear capacity of the T beams with transverse steel reinforcement and anchorage were significantly underestimated. The results and differences between the experimental and analytical results will be discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Doctor Engineer, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroclaw Univ. of Science and Technology, ul. Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland. ORCID: .
Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroclaw Univ. of Science and Technology, ul. Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland (corresponding author). ORCID: .
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2017. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2R-17. ACI Committee 440. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
3. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2020. Guide to design and construction of externally bonded fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix and steel-reinforced grout systems for repair and strengthening of concrete structures guide to design and construction of externally bonded fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems for repair and strengthening concrete and masonry structures. ACI 549.4R-20. ACI Committee 549. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.097 ↗
5. 10.1617/s11527-005-9027-210.1617/s11527-005-9027-2 ↗
6. BSI (British Standards Institution). 2008. Design of concrete structures – part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2. PN-EN 1992:2008. London: BSI.
7. CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2009. Testing hardened concrete. part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. EN 12390-3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
8. CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2019. Metallic materials - tensile testing - part 1: Method of test at room temperature. EN ISO 6892-1:2019. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.041 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.013 ↗
13. fib (Fédération Internationale du Béton). 2010. Vol. 1 of Model code for concrete structures. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.12810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.128 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40091-015-0102-910.1007/s40091-015-0102-9 ↗
16. Marcinczak, D., T. Trapko, and M. Musiał. 2018. “Comparison of RC beams strengthened with PBO-FRCM composite with different types of anchorage.” In Proc., fib 2018 Congress. Lausanne: Switzerland: fib.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.06110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.061 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000026310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000263 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1680/stbu.2011.164.4.26510.1680/stbu.2011.164.4.265 ↗
21. Ombres, L. 2012. “Shear capacity of concrete beams strengthened with cement based composite materials.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Paper No. 01-281. Mississauga, ON: CICE.
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.05910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.059 ↗
24. Ruredil. 2009. X mesh gold data sheet. Milan, Italy: Ruredil SPA.
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.055 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.07610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.076 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.041 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.008 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.02410.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.024 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.00810.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.024 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11527-005-9034-310.1007/s11527-005-9034-3 ↗
34. 10.1617/s11527-014-0470-910.1617/s11527-014-0470-9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.21610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.216 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.13210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.132 ↗